Omega 33.3 dial inquiry

Posts
8,107
Likes
28,571
I have no strong opinion, but would be surprised if Dino were to misrepresent a dial as original.
 
Posts
2,822
Likes
4,926
Here is a dial with the same sub-dial design. As is evident, the Omega signature and emblem look very different.

276746-0e5d6c10517b7938388854a96038c60f.jpg
 
Posts
8,107
Likes
28,571
Yes, the signature does look suspicious. I agree.
 
Posts
2,822
Likes
4,926
The spacing of the letters in "Tachymetre" is quite wide, too. Overall, the character of the dial does not seem right, to me.
 
Posts
8,107
Likes
28,571
I have no relationship with Dino, but he has been selling exceptional (and expensive) watches for a number of years now, and they typically look correct. In no way am I excusing him if this is an exception, but I am certain that high-end dealers of his type are having a much more difficult time sourcing good, fresh stock these days, and may well be tempted to "push the envelope" as a result.
 
Posts
5,598
Likes
9,424
Dial looks ok. As a dial. Without the omega sign and omega wording..... Need a back of the dial pics for that kind of price. kind regards. Achim
 
Posts
2,822
Likes
4,926
I have no relationship with Dino, but he has been selling exceptional (and expensive) watches for a number of years now, and they typically look correct. In no way am I excusing him if this is an exception, but I am certain that high-end dealers of his type are having a much more difficult time sourcing good, fresh stock these days, and may well be tempted to "push the envelope" as a result.
I appreciate the perspective, Tony. I am no expert on Omega but the appearance of this dial, coupled with the trend that you allude to, makes me curious.
 
Posts
2,520
Likes
17,832
I have a few 40’s Omega chronographs and none of them have OMEGA looking like that.

Two others, not mine