I second this. As an owner of the current gen Moonwatches and an Ed White, 3861 Moonwatch indeed wears better than Ed White. It's thinner to begin with and the presence of crown guard makes it feel more balanced and compact on the wrist, the EW simply feels taller and more "pronounced".
I second this. As an owner of the current gen Moonwatches and an Ed White, 3861 Moonwatch indeed wears better than Ed White. It's thinner to begin with and the presence of crown guard makes it feel more balanced and compact on the wrist, the EW simply feels taller and more "pronounced".
FWIW, I don't notice ANY difference in wear-ability between the 1861/3861/321EW. I don't wear dress-cuffs, but they all fit about the same to me?
I don't have a particularly big wrist (~6.25"), so I'm a bit surprised to hear everyone notice it but me 😁
Are you distinguishing ‘dress cuff’ from say more relaxed long sleeve dress shirts such as Oxford cloth button down (OCBD)?
rarely see the 321 on anything aside from the OEM bracelet, looks good on leather. Is it capable of going under a long sleeve?
you don't feel the 321 wears thick?
Thanks - exactly! The 321 EW comes more pronounced. I think it's true more with me, because I wear formal attire with neck tie Mon-Friday. 3861 lyre lug shaped professionals has a thickness of 13.5mm (hesalite) & 13.2mm (sapphire), while EW has 13.7mm. I want the case could fit inside of cuffs of my dress shirt. 321 won't do that well.
At the end of the day it's all relative. I've been wearing an IWC 3706 Pilot Chrono lately which is 14.6 mm tall, and once I got used to it every Speedy feels thin to me...
At the end of the day it's all relative. I've been wearing an IWC 3706 Pilot Chrono lately which is 14.6 mm tall, and once I got used to it every Speedy feels thin to me...
