Omega 18K Constellation.......... what a difference a decade makes

Posts
1,527
Likes
4,357
Evening all

I had a few of my watches out tonight and was comparing two of my favourite pieces, debating if perhaps I should let one go (which I have since seen sense on).

It occurred to me they were almost 10 years apart in age and when comparing the two it made me realise what an enormous polar shift Omega made in the space of a decade. Moving from their Chronometer 18K pie pan to the 18K Megaquartz stardust.

This was a monumental leap in technology, the Megaquartz 1510 movement was developed in 1970, accurate to just one single second per month compared to the Pie Pan, accurate to circa 3-5 SPD (on my wrist).

The case on my Pie Pan is a UK made Dennison example (IMHO simply the best of the best), dating to may 1965 (the magical 10000), the Megaquartz dates to July 1975. Both supremely well made (the case on the Megaquartz weighing an enormous 95 grams) but what a totally different pair and completely different vision by Omega of how their flagship lined looked in just the space of 10 years.

Anyway, here they are:

Edited:
 
Posts
1,945
Likes
3,551
I say sell the Pie Pan. Dibs.
 
Posts
269
Likes
192
Do keep in mind that this was the time were polyester and bell bottom pants were the range. need i say more? 😉
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
1,884
Do keep in mind that this was the time were polyester and bell bottom pants were the range. need i say more? 😉

And lots of Timex!

Tom
 
Posts
1,527
Likes
4,357
Ha ha, I her that but you know what, the stardust is a beautiful watch and it has an amazing wrist presence, hand made dial, the ultimate quartz movement (accepting thats not everyones bag) and a hand made case in Fontana (Italy)

Here's a few more snaps of the Dennison, which is definitely enjoying some much needed wrist time

 
Posts
1,527
Likes
4,357
To be honest chaps I am likely to keep both, I love them both in different ways and am truly loving the Pie Pan, just regret selling my SS version
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
1,884
Cheap, tough and expendable.

I had a Stocker and Yale 590 for that but when I found out how much it would cos to replace the tritium, I gave up.

My Omega watches so far have survived the adventure that is on my wrist whilst banging around.

Tom
 
Posts
9
Likes
2
Speaking of Timex, I just bought this Timex Electronic for $2.00 at a thrift store. Came on a Spiedel calendar band showing De. '71 which I removed. I think it's pretty nifty.
 
Posts
87
Likes
22
I had a Stocker and Yale 590 for that but when I found out how much it would cos to replace the tritium, I gave up.

My Omega watches so far have survived the adventure that is on my wrist whilst banging around.

Tom
I'm doing serious house modification. SDS hammer drills, Cold chisels and lump hammers etc etc.
 
Posts
1,945
Likes
3,551
As an amateur astronomer the stardust dial is on my list of "one day".
 
Posts
68
Likes
144
Now I've seen the gold star dust so let's hope you wear the pie pan for Sunday.

Baden
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,647
.....but .......but ........but some of these watches have [gasp] BATTERIES!!!! 😲
 
Posts
1,527
Likes
4,357
Both are wonderful in their own unique way, we can chose to poo poo the battery powered beast but this isn't your average quartz watch, far far from it! That's like comparing a Casio to a Constellation Chronometer.
 
Posts
87
Likes
22
I bought this subtle, understated 1995 item, just for the hell of it, a few months back. It was a bit too flash for an oil sheikh allegedly.

All in the best possible taste of course.