ZWD
·Hello!
I have a friends watch on the bench and would love to share some photos and get some thoughts.
It has a been a fun one to research.
This one has got a whole lot wrong going on and once you see one thing, you start seeing lots of things wrong 🧵
The dial on the 166.092 seem to dominantly have the single bushed direction vs the 166.066 that has the "X" pattern. The 192 has the -swiss made- below the indices and the 066 between. Not sure if there was a transitional dial where the 'X' pattern was on a 192. I have never seen the back of a know genuine example to know if this is a bad redial or an outright forgery. Dial does not have any Lum, Swiss Made is too low and lacking dashes, Brush direction is not straight, date disc is black rather than the white, etc, etc.. Dial used little adhesive pad in addition to a single dial foot. (seen on the movement).
The Case is poorly polished and possibly suspect, Crown looks correct, Caseback looks correct - but at this stage unsure about any of it.
Hands are in bad shape. Second sweeps is incorrect color and shape, hour and minute looks like some others online but at this point would doubt it.
I appreciate any thoughts/comments on this. Fun reference. I do love this hobby for the forensic side it offers, less fun to tell a friend that watch he bought 7 years ago looks to be not what he thought it was 😀
I have a friends watch on the bench and would love to share some photos and get some thoughts.
It has a been a fun one to research.
This one has got a whole lot wrong going on and once you see one thing, you start seeing lots of things wrong 🧵
The dial on the 166.092 seem to dominantly have the single bushed direction vs the 166.066 that has the "X" pattern. The 192 has the -swiss made- below the indices and the 066 between. Not sure if there was a transitional dial where the 'X' pattern was on a 192. I have never seen the back of a know genuine example to know if this is a bad redial or an outright forgery. Dial does not have any Lum, Swiss Made is too low and lacking dashes, Brush direction is not straight, date disc is black rather than the white, etc, etc.. Dial used little adhesive pad in addition to a single dial foot. (seen on the movement).
The Case is poorly polished and possibly suspect, Crown looks correct, Caseback looks correct - but at this stage unsure about any of it.
Hands are in bad shape. Second sweeps is incorrect color and shape, hour and minute looks like some others online but at this point would doubt it.
I appreciate any thoughts/comments on this. Fun reference. I do love this hobby for the forensic side it offers, less fun to tell a friend that watch he bought 7 years ago looks to be not what he thought it was 😀