Omega 166.037 Too Good?

Posts
2
Likes
6
I am looking to buy my first Omega. Currently looking at 60s/70s Seamasters and Geneves. I came across this 166.037 and I am concerned that it is potentially a redial.

1. All the other examples I see of this reference are Seamasters.

2. I have never seen this dial in all my searches.

3. It seems too nice

So any help is appreciated!

 
Posts
12,867
Likes
22,208
It’s a less commonly seen, but legitimate dial variation. Some references such as this can be found in both Seamaster and Geneve guises.
 
Posts
3,543
Likes
8,093
Overall condition of the watch certainly supports a pristine dial, I believe!

A sympathetic movement service and fresh gasket would be my first move before wearing or winding.

Welcome, let us know how things workout. I think it is beautiful.