- Posts
- 27
- Likes
- 2
Omega 166.002 with cyclops?
- Posts
- 13,373
- Likes
- 31,512
X350 XJR
··Vintage Omega AficionadoCyclops were optional on many references. Some people like them many don't, nothing right or wrong with them.
- Posts
- 20,270
- Likes
- 46,969
Dan S
·It's just a crystal.
- Posts
- 27
- Likes
- 2
obrunomartins
·It's just a crystal.
- Posts
- 16,193
- Likes
- 34,150
JimInOz
··Melbourne AustraliaIs it missing a bezel or is it just the angles and lighting?
- Posts
- 27
- Likes
- 2
obrunomartins
·Is it missing a bezel or is it just the angles and lighting?
- Posts
- 8,999
- Likes
- 46,223
gbesq
·Is the watch listed by a Japanese seller by any chance? Many 166.xxx references from Japan often have crystals with cyclops. As others have said, it's no big deal. If you don't like the cyclops, it's not expensive to have a watchmaker swap out the old crystal for a new one without the cyclops provided that you go with a generic replacement crystal. If you want a genuine Omega OEM crystal, that will cost considerably more.
- Posts
- 11,320
- Likes
- 19,831
Davidt
·I’ve had one of these before with a cyclops - genuine crystal, they have an L suffix.
Btw there is no bezel on the 166.002, it’s a fairly basic case.
Btw there is no bezel on the 166.002, it’s a fairly basic case.
- Posts
- 27
- Likes
- 2
obrunomartins
·Thank you for all information!
- Posts
- 173
- Likes
- 298
ACC1965
·Do you not like the cyclops, or just that it does not appear to match the size?
