Had the cyclops crystal on my 166.024 replaced

Posts
557
Likes
2,651
I bought this watch last year with a cyclops crystal, which I am personally not fond of. Yesterday I had it replaced by my watchmaker and now it looks way more beautiful to my eyes. Of course I'm still keeping the cyclops crystal. Which one do you prefer?

Before:


After(shot with my new Xiaomi phone with Leica optics):
 
Posts
782
Likes
838
Looks great! Is that a -67?

I actually love those old cyclops crystals. Send it to me 馃槈
 
Posts
557
Likes
2,651
PotAto/patata::rimshot::

Still cannot hide that date window馃榿

Next thread: Had the date window on my 166.024 covered with a black tape.
 
Posts
557
Likes
2,651
Looks great! Is that a -67?

I actually love those old cyclops crystals. Send it to me 馃槈

Yes, it is a -67, produced in November 1969, tail of 1960s.
 
Posts
8,704
Likes
61,763
You have to get with the times. People are using ramen noodles these days.




Indeed....then you can sell the date wheel for big bucks and have a nice dinner with a recent acquaintance ......and toast with a nice Chianti 馃榾
 
Posts
6,635
Likes
10,244
Without - every time.
Let鈥檚 leave the lumpy bumps to Rolex.
 
Posts
557
Likes
2,651
Another hack: I just set the date to 3 everyday.
 
Posts
476
Likes
396
Personally I like it either way. Am I remembering correctly that Omega magnifiers are on the inside of the crystal, so there is no bump, as there is with Rolex magnifiers? Looking again, I have a slight preference for the magnifier, it looks 1960s cool.

I LOVE dates on watches at 3 o'clock. I think the asymmetry keeps the composition of the watch dial interesting.