Feifei0416
·PC+2 was an unnecessary manoeuvre as far as their survival was concerned. It was done only to not splashdown in the Indian Ocean, where it would have taken more time to recover them. As they saw it as a very low risk manoeuvre with high benefits, they decided to go for it. If it would have been risky, they would have stay on the free-return trajectory (12 hours longer)
On the contrary, MCC 5 was necessary as the drift caused by the water sublimation would have put them out of the entry corridor. They had a timeframe of 30min to perform that correction. The time was not critical, but the duration was: an overburn would have been dramatic because it would have required a correction with the minus-x thrusters, which would have damaged the CM...
The PGNS was not used because it was consuming too much power and the spacecraft was designed to be operated without it.
MCC 7 was requested by the AEC to ensure the RTG and its plutonium ends up in the Tonga Trench, but it was not necessary for the crew safety..
We should let him design the next snoopy watch