- Posts
- 149
- Likes
- 1,853
Neyra
·here’s my 1959 ref. 14364-2!
Not all 321's are Speedmasters.....
- Posts
- 98
- Likes
- 63
Marcello130
·Beauty!!!!!
- Posts
- 109
- Likes
- 67
njlam
·Very nice! Original owner?
- Posts
- 721
- Likes
- 8,967
skand
·Seamaster 105.001- 62
- Posts
- 180
- Likes
- 332
- Posts
- 149
- Likes
- 1,853
- Posts
- 98
- Likes
- 63
Marcello130
·The nuances on the dial are interesting, compared to the one in the post underneath ..
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 15
Darius359
·That bracelet looks amazing. Where did you find it?
- Posts
- 328
- Likes
- 641
lucreative
·Almost a year later for an update to this thread, but I wanted to share my newest acquisition. My 1965 105.004 in solid 14K case. Had my watchmaker replace the crystal with a NOS Omega logo and adjusted the timing so I can wear it proudly during the holidays. It was running +2mins fast per day when I received it, but my watchmaker said the 321 movement was clean and can be adjusted. Running about +15secs fast now. Still uncovering the history behind this watch, but it's been exciting.
Edited:
- Posts
- 160
- Likes
- 136
omega1994
·Beautiful watch!
Are the square pushers on some models of these very hard to replace? Or are they not the sort of thing that need replacing- unsure how fragile these are, or how repairable. i assume easily damaged by water?
Are the square pushers on some models of these very hard to replace? Or are they not the sort of thing that need replacing- unsure how fragile these are, or how repairable. i assume easily damaged by water?
- Posts
- 38
- Likes
- 14
Tu13alcane
·That may change......
Living as long as me, you see the most ridiculous things gain value....
Porsche 356's, Aston DBS, Angle Poise,
I have a soft spot for Angle Poise... also i had to look it up before i knew what you are talking about. 😉
