Hi, do you have any pictures of the caseback? Best would be a picture from the caseback inside & the movement..?
No worries.. the ref.no is stamped on the caseback inside, based on that you can search for similar models, and look for differences, value, etc.
OK, I'll bite. Not so sure this is a redial. The hour markers and the minute tics look even and spaced. While the "E" in Omega looks a bit crooked this may be because of the picture/distortion. Lume is present, but no T's. However, I believe this watch predates this practice. Not 100% sure if Omega script/font is correct. And yes, lugs look massively polished unless this case ref is meant to have rounded lugs. I think the hands are incorrect. Overall I'd vote original with some minor concerns. Just imo.
I vote original dial. It's a very old watch so I expect it has aged and lost the sharp lines it once had, just like us all really.
Is this a redial also? Only "Swiss" on the bottom. The only rule about Vintage Omegas is that there are no rules. gatorcpa
Any thoughts about saying hello, please and thank you? I remember other impolite newcomers receiving much more of a drubbing... Although here one must note we're greeted with a cute kitty avatar.
Hello everyone! Thanks so much for the input so far. Much appreciated. This watch sat in my grandfathers drawer for decades. 1950s would be around when he got married, so receiving this as a gift then seems quite likely.
This picture locks it down: This is a US made case. The symbol to the left of the "10K" is a star. That means that the case was made by the Star Watch Case Company. No question in my mind that this is a US market piece. Highly unlikely you will find any information in the Omega Vintage Database on this watch. gatorcpa