I think I should clarify.
While NH did spend a lot of his life as a "watchmaker", he is now aiming to be a "watch maker" (manufacturer).
There are many levels of "watchmaker", e.g. our own
@Archer is a watchmaker because he fixes/repairs/services watches. While this may be considered as "watch technician", I'm sure he has had to "make" many items to get a watch working again if the parts are no longer available.
He also qualifies as a "watchmaker" because he produces watches with his own brand. This is done by sourcing the many parts required and assembling them into a watch. Isn't he then just a "watch assembler"?
If you think making watches this way is just putting parts together and "bingo" you have made a watch, then you are in need of serious watch education. There are countless implications to consider in the design, parts assessment, parts sourcing, configuration, assembly, testing etc etc. (BTW, NH is also a "watch assembler" with his line of REBELDE watches).
And then there is the watch
maker.
Somebody like George Daniels (to use the master as an example), and many others, who take "a lump of metal and a file" and after many months (or even years) produces a watch.
So NH is is on that crazy journey, somewhere between George Daniels and Rolex S.A. as the first and only "watch maker" in Australia.
I know this may look like a fan boy post (I'm way too old to be a fan boy) or an advertisement (I wish I was paid for this) but I admire the way he is going about this. And if he pulls it off, what about the opportunities for young people to develop and continue something almost unimaginable.
An Australian
made watch? "Fuck off mate, you're joking!"
Move on five or ten years.
An Australian
made watch? "You're joking, that looks good, where can I get one".
Click to expand...