Eon
·Hey all, I recently posted about my first ever vintage watch as well as my first ever Omega, a little 1950s Seamaster that I snagged on a whim. I learned from the post that it's not s pristine specimen (I already knew that) and what exactly wasn't factory about it. From that thread, I learned a lot but also raised a lot of questions. I figured it would be best to lump them all together in one thread as a sort of reverse AMA.
1*) When it comes to a redialed watch, why is it so looked down upon? We're not talking about bad redials here, just what could be considered a "good" redial. Why is it such a bad thing?
2*) What are some small details that would give away a redialed watch assuming there wasn't anything as big as missing second markings, misaligned crests, etc. (I've seen the Worst Redials thread, so I sort of know what the dead giveaways are.
3) Is there such a thing as too much patina?
4) What are your personal deal breakers for a piece you found?
5) What are your personal vintage grails? Why?
6) What are some of the best "must have" vintages (Omega or otherwise) for me to take a look at for inspiration? I'm not of the belief that there are any "must have" watches in general but it'll give me a good idea of what people value and why.
7) What are some vintages to avoid like the plague?
8) What are your methods you use to avoid taking baths? Everyone is bound to get burned but what would your advice to a novice be?
9) What got you into vintage watches to begin with and what has your journey looked like?
Thank you for taking time out of your days to enlighten me, I appreciate it a ton!
*Here are some examples from the Worst Redials thread, can you please point out to me what's so bad about them? To my novice eye they don't look too shabby and I'd be happy with one unless someone told me otherwise.
#1
#2
#3
#4 (My little Omega, what gives away the redial to the trained eye but not to mine other than the lume reapply? Is it the "Automatic" being a little too close together?)
1*) When it comes to a redialed watch, why is it so looked down upon? We're not talking about bad redials here, just what could be considered a "good" redial. Why is it such a bad thing?
2*) What are some small details that would give away a redialed watch assuming there wasn't anything as big as missing second markings, misaligned crests, etc. (I've seen the Worst Redials thread, so I sort of know what the dead giveaways are.
3) Is there such a thing as too much patina?
4) What are your personal deal breakers for a piece you found?
5) What are your personal vintage grails? Why?
6) What are some of the best "must have" vintages (Omega or otherwise) for me to take a look at for inspiration? I'm not of the belief that there are any "must have" watches in general but it'll give me a good idea of what people value and why.
7) What are some vintages to avoid like the plague?
8) What are your methods you use to avoid taking baths? Everyone is bound to get burned but what would your advice to a novice be?
9) What got you into vintage watches to begin with and what has your journey looked like?
Thank you for taking time out of your days to enlighten me, I appreciate it a ton!
*Here are some examples from the Worst Redials thread, can you please point out to me what's so bad about them? To my novice eye they don't look too shabby and I'd be happy with one unless someone told me otherwise.
#1
#2
#3
#4 (My little Omega, what gives away the redial to the trained eye but not to mine other than the lume reapply? Is it the "Automatic" being a little too close together?)


