- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
New to the Game
- Posts
- 1,171
- Likes
- 2,433
Nepomuceño
·Could use some better/zoomed in pictures of the dial, case back, movement?
- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
bluer
·Could use some better/zoomed in pictures of the dial, case back, movement?
- Posts
- 587
- Likes
- 2,928
Rudi99
·Hi bluer and welcome.
Taking a closer look at the dial, the slightly inconsistent Omega font tells me it might be a redial..
This kind of syringe hands and printed (not applied) logo also indicates the watch is probably from the 40s. It is hard to read the serial number inside of the movement, which would give us the exact year the watch was made.
It definetely does not look bad though if you are wearing it!
Taking a closer look at the dial, the slightly inconsistent Omega font tells me it might be a redial..
This kind of syringe hands and printed (not applied) logo also indicates the watch is probably from the 40s. It is hard to read the serial number inside of the movement, which would give us the exact year the watch was made.
It definetely does not look bad though if you are wearing it!
- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
bluer
·Hi bluer and welcome.
Taking a closer look at the dial, the slightly inconsistent Omega font tells me it might be a redial..
This kind of syringe hands and printed (not applied) logo also indicates the watch is probably from the 40s. It is hard to read the serial number inside of the movement, which would give us the exact year the watch was made.
It definetely does not look bad though if you are wearing it!
