New Purchase help - Seamaster Jumbo

Posts
3
Likes
1
Hi All

First post here. I've been into watches for a few years now, when I first got into them I thought vintage Constellations were the most beautiful watches in the world! I was heartbroken when I found that they would be too small for my wrist. I even bought a cheap 35mm Timex to test it out and it was just a hair too small for my taste- I have pretty large wrists at 7.75", a blessing for modern watches but a curse for vintage!

Browsing for a dress watch the other day I strayed back to vintage watches and realised I had probably given up my original search too quickly, as a few 'Jumbo' references of different watches exist. Of them this Seamaster has really caught my eye and at 37mm looks perfect. I'm really out of my depth when it comes to vintage watches so I would really appreciate someone having a quick look at this one before I consider it further.

For reference I'm not overly concerned with this being a perfect collectors example as I don't really intend to sell this watch in the future. It is more to mark a personal milestone, however I don't want it to be a complete 'Franken-watch' or have any major issues.

The seller seems to be very well regarded with lots of positive reviews and they've listed the watch as, 'Reference 2494-5 2657 Sc -1952 - '

I've searched extensively on Google and can find a lot of very similar watches but none with the exact same dial layout at the same size. It looks to be very polished and the lugs look to be a fair bit thinner than other examples but this doesn't really bother me all that much. My main concern however is the text on the dial - the M in Omega looks a little wonky in some photos, does this signal that it has been repainted? I asked the seller and they say the dial is original. Also, the crown looks a different shape to other crowns on similar models. Apart from that are there any other red flags you can see?

Thanks in Advance!
Oli



559753-5e3ec58b4fd0c.jpg
599712-alb-5eb68fca8d057.jpg
599712-alb-5eb6900b0d342.jpg 599712-alb-5eb690143a80c.jpg
 
Posts
13,478
Likes
31,757
These are actually 36mm and this one has been very heavily polished with a dial that isn't particularly attractive.

I'd keep looking.
 
Posts
8,359
Likes
68,676
Others may advise but, in the meantime, you can make your own comparison with mine.But, unless it’s the angle of the photo, the 'm' in Omega does look off and, as you surmise, it may well have been restored or redialled at some stage in the dim distant past, when that sort of thing was done more frequently.

Mine is also a 354 bumper (your movement looks very good) but whereas yours is an old 1952 model, mines a comparatively recent 1954 model with a 2767 case.

 
Posts
3
Likes
1
These are actually 36mm and this one has been very heavily polished with a dial that isn't particularly attractive.

I'd keep looking.

Thanks I think I will keep looking for a better example now, the dial makes me a bit uneasy.
 
Posts
3
Likes
1
Others may advise but, in the meantime, you can make your own comparison with mine.But, unless it’s the angle of the photo, the 'm' in Omega does look off and, as you surmise, it may well have been restored or redialled at some stage in the dim distant past, when that sort of thing was done more frequently.

Mine is also a 354 bumper (your movement looks very good) but whereas yours is an old 1952 model, mines a comparatively recent 1954 model with a 2767 case.


This is beautiful!