Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I am not an expert but the dial has no yellowing of the lum, it maybe a new dial.
And, I know that in some cases the tritium hands on these early Bond seamasters would age to a superluminova-like off-green (while the markers would age to yellow or pumpkin).
Here is my very early 2531.80. Tritium hands are going green and the markers are yellow. I like the look of the yellowing markers.
That's honestly beautiful. Has the dial actually faded to a blue-gray or is it a trick of the light? It's very attractive.
Yes it has, but the angle of light and light source make it hard to take pics of. With my phone flash its more gray, with a flash light at an angle its more blue.
I think the 2541 was produced until the 1997 changeover from Tritium to superluminova. I think. These appear to be luminova, regardless. Tagging @padders , who knows a heck of a lot about this reference
I know the successor 2221 quartz was produced after (and has red text and applied markers) and is SL only
And, I know that in some cases the tritium hands on these early Bond seamasters would age to a superluminova-like off-green (while the markers would age to yellow or pumpkin).
Frankly, I am not sure if I want an auto or quartz.
That's honestly beautiful. Has the dial actually faded to a blue-gray or is it a trick of the light? It's very attractive.
I think the 2541 was produced until the 1997 changeover from Tritium to superluminova. I think. These appear to be luminova, regardless. Tagging @padders , who knows a heck of a lot about this reference
I know the successor 2221 quartz was produced after (and has red text and applied markers) and is SL only
And, I know that in some cases the tritium hands on these early Bond seamasters would age to a superluminova-like off-green (while the markers would age to yellow or pumpkin).
Replacement dials or not would not impact my decision to purchase one of these watches in the 2K range.
I agree the first one appears to have been clearly refinished. Not.. I'm not a fan. The second one probably has been polished but at a basic glance, looks better
@gramboda we are pretty big on pictures here because links very often break after sales are completed and it allows us to have a record of conversation with pictures for other people's reference. Are you on mobile or desktop?
Good choice on this reference. If you are on a budget and don't want to pay for an expensive mechanical service, quartz may be the way to go. I don't think you can go wrong either way, the first Bond Omega was a quartz after all!
That said... omega's quartz movements are not anything special to write home about (the thermo-compensated ones being something of an exception). My coaxial Seamaster keeps time as accurately--- iirc omega rated them ~0.5- ~0.7 sec/day.
You can buy a radio-controlled citizen for under 200 that will keep perfectly accurate time, and not have to worry about a "battery" replacement for at least a decade and likely longer- while the seamaster battery will last about 3 years.
If it is at all about the technology to you, something to keep in mind. If it isn't and you just want a golden eye seamaster, it's a good choice
Also, when servicing a tritium model Omega will often replace the hands with hands that have SuperLuminova. They can't use tritium any longer. Watches of this configuration will have yellow lume on the dial and white lume on the hands. It's not a good look in my opinion.