Need help with 145.012 Lume

Posts
440
Likes
948
Dear friends,

I notice some shine around the lume of my Speedmaster 145.012.

Is this a sign of relume pls? Or does the original lume have such characteristics?

Much appreciated in advance for any advice given. Thank you.
 
Posts
188
Likes
481
original lume on 145.012 can show many, many different expressions

pictures are near by, but not good enough/ not sharp

how is the texture? more rough ore more smooth

smooth should it not be
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
Thank you for the reply.

The lume itself is a bit rough. I am more concerned about the perimeter of the lume, on the dial itself. The surface of this area looks shiny. Like lacquer applied around some parts of the lume.
 
Posts
2,151
Likes
4,296
The lume is applied to white strips and you can often see the edges at top and bottom and on sides. Lume can look a little wonky at high magnification.
Yours looks ok to me
Here’s example to show white edges
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
I understand this buddy.

What i meant is just outside of the white painted hour markers, on the black dial itself, i see some shine. Like there is overspill of clear lacquer onto the dial.

It is very hard to capture but i will try again tomorrow.
 
Posts
712
Likes
1,994
Really hard to tell from your photo's, its possible someone tried to stabilize the lume using lacquer.
 
Posts
11,991
Likes
20,831
Perhaps they’ve had lacquer applied to stabilise, or sometimes the dial surface can get shiny/oily looking stains for natural ageing, or response to a relume.
You’re going to have to provide better photos for any more certainty.
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
Ok. I will take some more photos. Thank you to all who responded.
 
Posts
1,220
Likes
5,522
Based on these pictures, I would lean towards original. It looks very similar to one of my 145.012's. Last check you could of course do is UV exposure, which I guess you've already tried?
 
Posts
275
Likes
1,739
I would agree that it is most likely an attempt to stabilize the original lume. I passed on a beautiful '62 Speedmaster because whenever I looked at it, all I saw was the stabilizing agent leaking around the plots.
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
Based on these pictures, I would lean towards original. It looks very similar to one of my 145.012's. Last check you could of course do is UV exposure, which I guess you've already tried?
Yes buddy. UV reacted as they should. Thank you for the feedback.
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
I would agree that it is most likely an attempt to stabilize the original lume. I passed on a beautiful '62 Speedmaster because whenever I looked at it, all I saw was the stabilizing agent leaking around the plot.
Will stablising the lume cost a lost of value? Is it as bad as a relume?
 
Posts
188
Likes
481
if it is visible, i think a lot of potentiel buyers (and they make abig part of the value) will pass on this one
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
Problem now is I cannot even confirm if it's a relume or lacquer was added to stabilize the lume.

Will be tough to even suggest returning it. Sad...

But i supposed it is what it is...
 
Posts
188
Likes
481
i am not sure, that there is something stabilized

i can not judge from the pictures

at least for me is the question:

what is this? and is it something, that is not result from aging or a kind of reaction?
(red markings)

generelly i think, that a kind of stabilising the lume from index-lume on indices like
this is rather unusual and rather not necessary, because it would be rather a kind
of lume lost

 
Posts
11,991
Likes
20,831
I'm kind of swaying towards original but with slight deterioration.

In cases like this where it's such a close call between is it original, is it a relume or has it been stabilised, I think it gets to the stage where it's irrelevant. It's the overall aesthetic impact that matters and that's what impacts the value.
 
Posts
188
Likes
481
that's the point

but also: it is a very strong magnifikation (and sometimes bad digital camera or smartphone is
suboptimal)

if we check our own watches in a way like this (same magnification) we - perhabs - also think about, what we see

it would be good, if a really experienced person could check by own eyes by loupe
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
i am not sure, that there is something stabilized

i can not judge from the pictures

at least for me is the question:

what is this? and is it something, that is not result from aging or a kind of reaction?
(red markings)

generelly i think, that a kind of stabilising the lume from index-lume on indices like
this is rather unusual and rather not necessary, because it would be rather a kind
of lume lost

Yes. These were what i was concerned about initially...
 
Posts
440
Likes
948
I'm kind of swaying towards original but with slight deterioration.

In cases like this where it's such a close call between is it original, is it a relume or has it been stabilised, I think it gets to the stage where it's irrelevant. It's the overall aesthetic impact that matters and that's what impacts the value.
Wow, i just came to the same conclusion before reading the replies! 😀

Going to wear the hell out of this watch. 🙏