Need advice on an alleged Seamaster 166.009

Posts
1
Likes
0
Hey all,

New Omega fan here. I recently came into ownership of this Seamaster, ref. 166.009. Upon sitting on the watch for a few days and doing some digging after I bought it, I'm now realizing that it might be a redial. The seller said it has been serviced both recently and a few times in the past, as evident by the underside of the caseback. The seller also stated that the crown is original, but I am scrupulous of that. I'm not entirely upset that it could a redial, but I wanted to get the opinions of some folks smarter than I.

Many thanks!
20210126_162413.jpg
20210126_162424.jpg
20210126_162505.jpg
20210126_162510.jpg

20210126_162525.jpg