Forums Latest Members
  1. red00005 Feb 6, 2016

    Posts
    59
    Likes
    60
    Can someone please tell me what Missions/Astronauts wore the 145.022-69? Were these produced too late for Apollo 11?
     
  2. Davidt Feb 6, 2016

    Posts
    10,422
    Likes
    18,127
    I don't believe any did.

    They were still using 321 Speedmasters well into the 70's. 861 powered Speedmasters were used on shuttle missions to present day but I believe they are altered slightly from those on general sale, such as having a radial dial.

    Part of the reason the 321's are so desired is due to the fact they are identical to those used by nasa.
     
  3. JACK G Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    359
    Likes
    646
  4. watchtinker Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    398
    Moonwatches are 105.012 and 145.012 only.
     
  5. JACK G Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    359
    Likes
    646
  6. watchtinker Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    398
  7. JACK G Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    359
    Likes
    646
    Although the title of this post is NASA/Speedy Experts I am neither but I have done some research on the subject.

    I am aware that there are conflicting views but from memory Gene Cernan in his autobiography (read about 3 years ago) is pictured with and comments on his 105.003 with missing bezel as the watch he wore on the moon.

    I don't mind being corrected but it seems that we are both hanging our hats on a museum label.
     
  8. JACK G Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    359
    Likes
    646
    " Eugene Cernan, now an Omega ambassador, still wears his Speedmaster, the one that he took onto the moon in the final Apollo 17 mission in December 1972 (and even before: he already had the watch for Gemini 9A, 1966, and Apollo 10, 1969).

    He says, “The Speedmaster is the only thing we took the Moon that had no modification whatsoever – it was right off the shelf. What’s interesting about my first one is that it’s beat up, it’s never been cleaned, it’s never been repaired and to this day I can take that watch and wind it and it keeps time as well as the day I got it.

    And I’ve walked in space with it for two and a half hours and worn it on the Moon for over three days.”

    In the link within my earlier post https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/omega.html this watch is listed as 105.003.
     
  9. red00005 Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    59
    Likes
    60
    I am actually wondering if 861 models such as 145.022-69 were issued and worn by astronauts during any NASA missions - not necessarily on the moon itself.
     
  10. watchtinker Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    398
    I am not an expert either, but I tend to rely more on the Naval Museum side and, apart from this, there are some photographs that clearly show Cernan wearing a twisted lugs on the Moon:

    http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/ap...s-omega-speedmaster-612152-2.html#post4491688

    With respect to Cernan's words, they are sponsored and, additionally, remember that Dave Scott indicated to have worn a Waltham on the Moon which, recently, turned out to be instead a Bulova.
     
  11. Davidt Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    10,422
    Likes
    18,127
    I can't remember where I've seen it, but I'm sure Cernan had both a 145.012 and 105.003 issued to him.
     
  12. JACK G Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    359
    Likes
    646
    Hello watchtinker,

    An interesting debate here.

    One of the pics in your link above shows Gene Cernan wearing 2 watches.

    So can we call it a draw please?

    I need to believe the 105.003 was the first watch worn outside a space capsule and the last watch on the moon otherwise I will have to sell my 105.003!!!!

    Jack
     
    ricardorio likes this.
  13. CTS-V Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    784
    Likes
    7,247
    Very interesting.....subscribed!
     
  14. watchtinker Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    380
    Likes
    398
    My pleasure, Jack. ;)

    Cheers,

    Maurice
     
  15. ricardorio Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    629
    Likes
    4,537
    Dear friend, I have not found documented information or visual fact that could confirm your question. I really love this specific reference and I can not confirm that were used in space.

    145022 71-74 of course