Forums Latest Members

My first crown restoration and o-ring insertion

  1. kaplan Feb 18, 2023

    Posts
    2,263
    Likes
    2,573
    It's almost impossible finding vintage 1966 style 168.017 crowns. I haven't seen a code for these, only modern 42054 ones are available. However these aren't very hard to find in loose form, they usually have a flat feet logo and they are 4.7-4.8mm wide, this matters as it's possible to find smaller ones more easily yet they don't look right

    I bought this one for around $20 yet didn't pay much attention at the time of the missing inner parts, luckily it's cleaned and all the black gunk that's usually inside a crown is gone, so no need to go through stages of rigorous cleaning

    For the missing metal spacer, I was thinking of fabricating a ring out of a flattened aluminum can, it's my go-to method for making functional simple parts, but luckily came up with a better approach, found a generic crown from another generic chinese crown pack that had the exact fitting size - as another idea, this donor crown also had a so-so fitting o-ring, so it alone could've solved the problem, but used 3.4 x 1.8 x 0.8 o-ring from the pack here a https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002059223869.html (The tube of the watches are 2mm, so 1.8 seemed ok to grab it, 1.7 was better when testing loose)

    Finally used UV Resin to keep the metal in-place, applied it all the way around

    The case I used for testing has a tube fitted for a 42054 crown though, which is a thicker crown, so the tube protrudes 0.1-0.2mm ish more than ideal, you might think 0.1mm 0.2mm is negligible, but these make really noticeable differences

    IMG_3807.jpeg IMG_3808.jpeg IMG_3809.jpeg IMG_3810.jpeg IMG_3812.jpeg IMG_3813.jpeg IMG_3814.jpeg
     
    Edited Feb 18, 2023
    M'Bob, Rudi99, jayelblock and 4 others like this.
  2. josiahg52 Feb 18, 2023

    Posts
    870
    Likes
    1,642
    I feel like there's a modest opportunity for someone to rebuild important crowns and pushers. It's not a huge market but some would pay to have someone perform this competently. I'm not looking to swim with my vintage watches but I would like to not have to take it off to wash my hands.

    Very nice job.
     
  3. kaplan Feb 18, 2023

    Posts
    2,263
    Likes
    2,573
    Thank you, the last part is a bit icky, I wouldn't feel very good about removing the plate only to imperfectly attaching it back in place - it's surprisingly easy to remove, maybe more experienced members can pitch in but I'd theorize it's maybe originally press fit in place? Sometimes while cleaning it comes out and I can't think of a better way of re-attaching it other than the resin - I guess laser welding in 2-3 spots might feel better

    It's a problem I think about too, and to be honest I just ignore potential water ingress and wash my hands with watches I wear.

    This thread and Archer's input was my original inspiration: https://omegaforums.net/threads/spe...rown-is-pulled-out.155549/page-2#post-2124270

    I guess as a community we can document crown specifications as much as we can so when the next enthusiast attempts the same thing, it could be a 100% sure thing before going in there to take measurements

    For this vintage 168.017 crown measurements were:
    Outside: 4.7mm
    Inside: 3.2mm
    Case Tube: 2mm
    Satisfactory O-Ring: 3.4 x 1.8 x 0.8

    I use my 166.003 daily, the crown is 3.75mm - I suspect the inner dimensions can't be that different though, so maybe the 3.2 x 1.8 x 0.7 or 3.25 x 1.75 x 0.75 could work

    I wouldn't trust this approach until someone with a pressure tester tests a watch before/after modification though, so in this regard, I'm not sure whether I'm going to replace the o-ring on my 166.003 - similarly I use generic caseback o-rings as well, as close I can get to original sizes, but don't really trust them, mainly worry that even a slight overlap of the o-ring could create an easy way for the water to go in. Potentially the wrong o-ring could maybe do more damage? Only testing could tell. Would make an interesting Youtube video.

    I probably just have trust issues though :D
     
    M'Bob, sheepdoll and josiahg52 like this.
  4. josiahg52 Feb 18, 2023

    Posts
    870
    Likes
    1,642
    I looked at my 145.022 69 crown when I got it back from service. The gasket was all but gone, it looked like the crown had a nipple and after the o-ring was in place, the washer was installed and the nipple was burnished. I'm sure disassembly - once - is pretty straightforward but how many times can the nipple be manipulated before it's obliterated?

    I agree that there is still some trial and error and the real proof is a passed water test. At the end of the day, the watches are more than crowns and pushers. Much rather have a sharp case, nice dial, and good hands.
     
  5. Pip Feb 26, 2023

    Posts
    60
    Likes
    81
    This is becoming a known trick in the vintage Seiko world, where one uses a staking set to bend the flat 'washer' to remove it, get all the glutinous blank gunk out and clean it all, install new gaskets and then using a staking set set the washer back in and flatten it into place. I probably haven't explained it that well but if you follow the steps you'll get what I mean.
     
    ticktinker, tritto and josiahg52 like this.