Winston_Smith
路Hey everyone! This seems to be one of most comprehensive and useful threads on the forum, which I've only recently discovered! Lovely read and many thanks to all contributors, particularly the OP馃摉
I've come across the Sm 120 below. While it looked beautiful and quite attractive, there are a few dodgy things I've noted, which you can find in the bottom of the post.
- The way Seamaster is written: m has the starting line so not a "Seanaster" but doesn't have the tail on upper left. I've noticed that in this model, t is smaller than neighbouring s but in this model, t is higher. Finally, r didn't feel right.
- The colour of the font: just faded, wrong or also plausible?
+ Apart from above, I believe that the font used for Omega and Seamaster 120 parts are overall ok for its time. Also the bezel seems to be right and fine. Tritium lumes looked lovely. If it passed the "dial screening" I will go on to the movement and case back checks , so waiting for your comments 馃榾
I've come across the Sm 120 below. While it looked beautiful and quite attractive, there are a few dodgy things I've noted, which you can find in the bottom of the post.
- The way Seamaster is written: m has the starting line so not a "Seanaster" but doesn't have the tail on upper left. I've noticed that in this model, t is smaller than neighbouring s but in this model, t is higher. Finally, r didn't feel right.
- The colour of the font: just faded, wrong or also plausible?
+ Apart from above, I believe that the font used for Omega and Seamaster 120 parts are overall ok for its time. Also the bezel seems to be right and fine. Tritium lumes looked lovely. If it passed the "dial screening" I will go on to the movement and case back checks , so waiting for your comments 馃榾












