Lumebattle!

Posts
270
Likes
970
TL: Omega SMP 2231.50.00
TR: Zenith CP2 flyback
BL: Sinn 857 UTC
BR: Sinn EZM 13


To be continued occasionally.

Want to contribute?
Use ISO 2500 f/2.8 4s for exposure.

Edit:
These are the actors in daylight:
Edited:
 
Posts
1,301
Likes
2,576
Wow, great idea you've got there. What's the elapsed time between each exposure?
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
It's 15 minutes - as can be observed - for a total time of 8h, i.e. 32 individual photos.
 
Posts
389
Likes
1,560
Love it!--I'd suggest letting it fade to complete black before restarting the cycle--gives it more narrative that way.
 
Posts
290
Likes
440
Very neat and (in hindsight) obvious idea! If I can find a stand (and timelapse app for my phone) I can see a duel happening between my Watchco SM300 with Seiko Turtle SRP777
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
Love it!--I'd suggest letting it fade to complete black before restarting the cycle--gives it more narrative that way.
Good advice. Will insert some black frames and a flash before restarting next time.
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
The EZM 13 has surprisingly good lume. SMP still wins though
For hands which are not filled but coated this is indeed a good result.

In real world the CP2 is the most legible. Hands are as bright as the SMP but background is fading more quickly. With the SMP I am having trouble sometimes if the hour hand lines up with one of the hour markers: When it's dim it can be difficult to distinguish from the minute hand.
 
Posts
302
Likes
1,185
This is cool and they last longer than I thought. Do more watches!
 
Posts
349
Likes
562
Cool idea ! I may be dumb but I have to ask ; how did you do this ? I suppose you didn't take a picture manually every 15min ?
 
Posts
1,023
Likes
1,018
I have a seiko that would have lost all charge after 15 seconds 🤦
 
Posts
18,146
Likes
27,433
I have a seiko that would have lost all charge after 15 seconds 🤦
My 68 holds about 5 minutes. It’s weird and my 6117-8000 isn’t the only one that still does. Original proof dial.
 
Posts
246
Likes
1,442
Great way to show a comparison👍

2254.50 is the king of lume in my book

smplum46.jpg
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
Cool idea ! I may be dumb but I have to ask ; how did you do this ? I suppose you didn't take a picture manually every 15min ?
Of course not.
Depends on your equipment:
- some cameras have a time lapse feature on board
- some allow "teathering" via USB port and a PC with a suitable program
- some allow "teathering" via WiFi and a suitable PC Program or Phone app.
- there are firmware extensions which provide that feature (e.g. magic lantern for canon). This is what I use.
- there have been boxes around for decades which trigger the RC ports of cameras in a certain interval.
- for nearly all phones there are apps around which does this job.
Edited:
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
And here is the promised sequel:

Lumebattle Episode II
Featuring
TL: 'ol sword hand SMP for reference
TR: THE one and only #Speedytuesday
BL: Baby Black Bay BB36
BR: Breguet Type XXI


Edit:
These are the actors in daylight:
Edited:
 
Posts
10,340
Likes
16,183
Excellent experimental research with academic value. Wow that Tudor is very good. I too use the 2254/5 as my benchmark for lume but I may have to open my mind a little. Perhaps it could be said that the Tudor min hand washes out a bit quicker than the Omega version but the lume is very good.

At the risk of being annoying, would it be possible to add a lit pic of the test subjects so we can see what the pieces in question look like? I know my Omegas but on the first test with the Sinn models I wouldn’t have a clue.
Edited:
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
At the risk of being annoying, would it be possible to add a lit pic of the test subjects so we can see what the pieces in question look like? I know my Omegas but on the first test with the Sinn models I wouldn’t have a clue.
Someone wants to see my watches 😀. Annoying - you must be kidding 😁.