Looking for insights & info

Posts
5
Likes
0
Hello all

I acquired this watch a year or so ago, off a auction site. Seller advised that watch was serviced and that dial was "cleaned"...

Serial number: 1608863x
Case back reference: 2846 & 2848

I believed the watch is from 1956.
Cal 500. I took it to a local jeweller when first received, movement was very clean & jeweller advised everything was in great working order, with no work required.

So, redial????
What kind of hands and why the absence of the name "seamaster" on the dial.

Any other info / details appreciated. I will continue to own & wear this watch. 93956b8e8a97609481b684694e92e1d3.jpg 37a539de8152a6ea91954db42ef432d8.jpg 572ac9e8ba87cf17e3ae981318719279.jpg 22f14660de85571cb87f94c331566661.jpg
 
Posts
957
Likes
3,175
To my fairly novice eye, appears to be a redial as you say. The "A" in omegA has a pointed top where I think it should be a bit flat (serif font-esque), the lack of "Seamaster" script could support a redial. Also, the hands appear to have lume? If so that may need to be indicated near the script "Swiss Made" with a "T", before a specific year it was not required (195X, can't remember the exact year) and could further support the redial conclusion. The crown looks like a decagonal one that was commonly used on the Constellation models, I don't believe I've seen one on an original SM before. Goggle the Omega Vintage Database and type in your reference number to get some info as well, but beware it is not a totally complete reference and not 100% accurate. Many others more knowledgeable than me can correct it to a T but thats my observations. In the end it is a pretty dress watch though, wear it well.
 
Posts
1,011
Likes
419
He cleaned it all of 馃榾 .Probably a redial and he brushed the case back with a sandpaper . Wrong crown in stainless steel . .
 
Posts
957
Likes
3,175
Sorry, your OP asked about the hands. I believe they are dauphine style. And as to why someone would redial to a black face is because they are generally more rare and thus more valuable. Cheers
 
Posts
1,072
Likes
1,480
hands certainly relumed, crown looks wrong. I am unable to tell from these poor quality photos much about the dial.
Can you get some better shots?
 
Posts
5
Likes
0
Thanks for the feedback. Both dial & hands have lume.
Crown may have been replaced, it is gold though, the front of the crown is "rubbed" pretty good, but the top of the crown is gold, sorry for the photo quality.