Longines silver art deco

Posts
422
Likes
882
The crown is not original and I suspect the shrapnel guard is something that was made aftermarket.

An attractive watch though. I've always has a soft spot for these silver deco, nouveau watches. I have about a dozen of them. They are not very good time keepers but they look neat.
 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
I've always has a soft spot for these silver deco, nouveau watches. I have about a dozen of them. They are not very good time keepers but they look neat.

Hi A., are yours from the same era and would you post a picture with some of them?
 
Posts
422
Likes
882
Hi A., are yours from the same era and would you post a picture with some of them?

Hello S, yes, same era. I will get some pictures over the break.
 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
Hello S, yes, same era. I will get some pictures over the break.
Thanks much 👍
 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
I suppose some "outdoors men" might have used shrapnel guards while hunting or roughing it in the wild, but I would imagine that such watches were dedicated "out door" watches -- i.e., removing the shrapnel guard for casual day-to-day wearing of the watch leaves the four holes in the case used to secure the shrapnel open to the elements....not very practical. My guess is that the watch in question was intended for military/combat environment and not an outdoors man's watch or some sort of civilian fashion statement of the period. I believe by the mid-1920s most higher end watch and case manufacturers had adopted some form of spring bar for attaching wrist straps, and had abandoned wire lugs.

Removing this shrapnel guard is not exactly practical either in combat. I don’t know either way but in general I’d be cautious about assuming combat use or military use, even it’s totally true shrapnel guards appear during WWI.

Also, the idea that fixed lugs past 1920 mean that a watch is military is inaccurate.
Unfortunately to equate fixed bars with military use is only helping dishonest sellers make bogus claims.

All of my watches below (or previously owned watches)have fixed lugs, from about 1936 to 1941 and they are not military.
And from low end manufacturers? I will let you be the judge. The pink one is from 1941.
 
Posts
1,957
Likes
25,748
Removing this shrapnel guard is not exactly practical either in combat. I don’t know either way but in general I’d be cautious about assuming combat use or military use, even it’s totally true shrapnel guards appear during WWI.

Also, the idea that fixed lugs past 1920 mean that a watch is military is inaccurate.
Unfortunately to equate fixed bars with military use is only helping dishonest sellers make bogus claims.

All of my watches below (or previously owned watches)have fixed lugs, from about 1936 to 1941 and they are not military.
And from low end manufacturers? I will let you be the judge. The pink one is from 1941.
I was in transit to sunnier warmer climes when you posted. Just now catching up on OF. First and foremost, Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays! Second, as usual, you have shared some wonderful watches!!

My post which you responded to was primarily intended to put a manufacture date to the watch in question given the visual clues it presents. Assuming the watch is original, and not some sort of modern recreation, the shrapnel guard would indicate that the watch was intended for rugged outdoor use - e.g., military use, hunting, camping, etc.. Given the number of men in the military during the period in question relative to the number of “outdoorsmen” likely to be wearing a Longines during the same period, the original owner of the watch was more likely a military man. If I had to venture a guess, I would think the case is original to Longines and the guard was custom made by a jeweler for its owner.

My comment regarding wire lugs was not intended in and of itself to imply that the watch was “military” but, rather, that they more likely dated the watch to the earlier time period being discussed in the thread - i.e., 1910s-1920s, rather than 1930s or later. As a “technological innovation”, spring bars were initially likely more common from higher end manufacturers interested in offering their customers the “latest and greatest” rather than from lower end manufacturers having greater production cost concerns. I too have watches, including higher end watches, with wire lugs which date from the late 1930s and 1940s. Again, the intent of my post was primarily to make an educated guess about the manufacture date of the watch. As a trend, wire lugs became less common from the mid-1920s onward.

Based upon the visual clues presented by the watch and “probabilities”, if I had to make a guess about the watch I would venture the case is original to Longines, the shrapnel guard was custom made by a jeweler, and the watch’s owner was in the Russian military, and was most likely an officer....and the watch dates somewhere 1916-1919.

Wishing everyone at OF a very Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and the very best of health, happiness and fortune in the New Year!
 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
@allwoundup I appreciate the points you are making, and will be very interested to find out more.
Below just for everyone’s viewing pleasure is a beautiful watch with a similarly styled dial but an obviously later case. Credit @misterenthusiast on Instagram.
Happy holidays to all!
 
Posts
432
Likes
741
All the guards I have seen clipped on the outside of the case. Having holes in the case make no sense to me. These guys were in the trenches and exposed to mud and rain and allowing dirt and water into the movement is not a good idea.
My guess it was added at a later date.
 
Posts
1,127
Likes
5,613
Ladies & Gents

It`s time for the new chapter in the art deco/nouveau silver Longines
saga. I have not seen pictures but I have been provided with the
serial number 3077323 and caliber 10.85N

I know that some of you got the Longines Heritage team on speed dial
and can set the record straight😉

 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
That’s cool. And as I’m sure everyone noticed, all of the online ressources date this movement to around 1913 -1914. So a very early watch indeed.
Seems like the case now is the place where the most info resides.... but Longines would require all the missing pics to answer a query.
 
Posts
477
Likes
1,649
I would love to see pictures. In this period LONGINES numbered their cases outside. If the case and movement are numbered correctly this would probably be the eldest rectangular LONGINES wristwatch known today
 
Posts
1,127
Likes
5,613
There are no number on the outside, and since the watch is in
a private collection I guess we will never know more about its
history.
 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
I would love to see pictures. In this period LONGINES numbered their cases outside. If the case and movement are numbered correctly this would probably be the eldest rectangular LONGINES wristwatch known today

True but if the case has Russian hallmarks (as mentioned above then it sounds like it’s a nationally produced case and not a Longines case.
Still quite lovely and remarkable but if so the archive would not contain any indication regarding the case or record a rectangular watch.
And indeed the only hint that it might be original to the watch lies in those stamped numbers that could be on it.

Was that the reason why you were asking the question?
 
Posts
7,651
Likes
21,952
Tidying up my files and realizing I had failed to share this info, which does indeed establish this watch is possibly the earliest known rectangular Longines, per @divetime’s indication.

The amazing Longines archive establishes Longines produced this rectangular silver case, the archive mentions the rectangular shape, and the watch was sold on January 10 1917 to Russia. The shrapnel guard is not mentioned and Longines watchmakers believed it was probably added later.

For the record below is my email exchange- in French- with Jennifer Bochud.

So yes dear @Radiumpassion, both you and I missed out on this one. Oh well. 🙄
 
Posts
1,127
Likes
5,613
Thank you for taking the time to check with Longines Heritage👍 @Syrte

It is still within range, I just forgot all about it😀