Longines Retrogrades?

Posts
17
Likes
6
Although they're extremely busy and bulky, I'm fascinated with Longines Retrograde Moonphase pieces (L707.2). There have been a few different references in recent years but no such retrograde is currently in the Longines line. There's one short thread here in the forum and there seems to be very little info online. Seemingly to this novice, such retrograde complications can be "rough" on a watch - potentially causing problems and requiring more frequent maintenance.

I'm just wondering if Longines had quality problems with this retrograde timepiece -or- was it just too darn busy and bulky for the market.?

Comments on the watch and my thoughts welcome. Thanks... JoeD
 
Posts
1,975
Likes
2,137
I too am a huge fan of these watches (in fact, the thread you mention might have been mine!). Which did you get? IIRC there is a 41 and a 44mm.

I spent quite a while looking into these a few years ago, but didn't want to buy unless I could see one in person, as I wasn't sure whether the 41 would look 'too crowded' for my tastes in person. Unfortunately, I never was able to see it.

There aren't any reports of maintenance problems with these, so i don't think that is the problem. I suspect this is entirely down to it being a watch that sadly didn't 'strike' the fancy of enough people, and thus never really sold.

The "Master Collection" line was 1 in a line of attempts for Longines to re-invent itself over the last few decades, and as far as I can tell, the last one that 'failed'. Basically since getting rid of that line, they did the smaller Zulu time/UltraChron/LLD, etc, all of which are very popular.

SO I kinda find myself wondering if this watch was just unpopular because the brand wasn't 'hip' yet/seen as valuable yet.

I keep an eye out for these, though they aren't resold often, and tend to be priced higher than I'd buy without seeing it in person.
 
Posts
17
Likes
6
I too am a huge fan of these watches (in fact, the thread you mention might have been mine!). Which did you get? IIRC there is a 41 and a 44mm........
......
I keep an eye out for these, though they aren't resold often, and tend to be priced higher than I'd buy without seeing it in person.
Yep, your thread. I haven't purchased one and have the same hesitations you have. I've seen a few 42's on the net. Their case height is huge @16+mm - likely making many interested buyers feel they MUST try before buy. As for the Master Collection - I love my Master small second Salmon.

Thanks for chiming in 馃榾
 
Posts
1,975
Likes
2,137
Yep, your thread. I haven't purchased one and have the same hesitations you have. I've seen a few 42's on the net. Their case height is huge @16+mm - likely making many interested buyers feel they MUST try before buy. As for the Master Collection - I love my Master small second Salmon.

Thanks for chiming in 馃榾
I actually have a pretty small wrist and have a similar sized watch (2225.80) and it isn't as big as 17mm thickness makes it sound! o

The real danger of the Retrograde is that you can't drive with it on! Distracted driving and all that 馃榾

FWIW, I think the Master Collection is awesome. The 'dress watch' style (vs sports watches) aren't particularly popular these days, so I suspect that is why they didn't sell well (most of the manufacturers are going through the same thing!), but they did a fantastic job with them.
 
Posts
17
Likes
6
.....The real danger of the Retrograde is that you can't drive with it on! Distracted driving and all that 馃榾
Gotta laugh or I'll cry! I used to fly jets, but even casual driving now task saturates me. This watch bug hit hard - I do find myself looking at my wrist while driving, even though I can no longer see sh**! Glad there's a big digital in the truck. Watches are cooool machines - dangerous too.
 
Posts
13,696
Likes
53,497
I was very interested in the line but on inspection at the dealer, too new and shiny. The vintage vibe wasn鈥檛 there.