Longines fm 1915 - is it original and worth the money?

Posts
16
Likes
1
Hi guys,
I fond below Longines on Chrono24 for 1950€+ shipping.
The dial looks pretty nice for more than 100 years even for a enamel one, do you think is original ?
There is no photos with the movement-I just ask the dealer to provide some... if is having!
What do you think, is worth the money?
Waiting for advices and comments as i have no clue about Longines
Thx in advance,
Leopold
 
Posts
2,794
Likes
4,845
Hour and minute hands are incorrect. Large size is a plus but the price is still too high, IMO. Wonder if the caliber is a 15.94?
 
Posts
12,778
Likes
17,349
Agree with the above.

I would also ask for pictures of the inside of the case to see the 18K hallmarks.

This dial originally had radium figures and hands. The hands were discarded and radium removed from the dial.

My guess is that this is a re-cased pocket watch. Very common in 1920’s and 1930’s. That will make it almost impossible to determine if all original or not.

I think for $2,100, you can do better, gold or not.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
Agree with the above.

I would also ask for pictures of the inside of the case to see the 18K hallmarks.

This dial originally had radium figures and hands. The hands were discarded and radium removed from the dial.

My guess is that this is a re-cased pocket watch. Very common in 1920’s and 1930’s. That will make it almost impossible to determine if all original or not.

I think for $2,100, you can do better, gold or not.
gatorcpa
Actually I was thinking the same, regarding numerals... I’ve seen lots of Rolex having the same type of numerals, but with radium!
 
Posts
473
Likes
1,630
yes it should have luminios hands at correct length. Ask if it is confirmed by extract of Longines archive if you are still interested.
 
Posts
59
Likes
68
I have found a similar watch in the book "Longines Watches" by John Goldberger, 2006, where the numerals haven't been filled with radium just like your example. It features a calibre 15.94 and dates back to 1917. (see picture below, full credit to John Goldberger, page 22/23)
I agree with @DirtyDozen12 about the hour and minute hands, I think originally there must have been "breguet antique" hands or maybe "cathedral" hands.
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
I have found a similar watch in the book "Longines Watches" by John Goldberger, 2006, where the numerals haven't been filled with radium just like your example. It features a calibre 15.94 and dates back to 1917. (see picture below, full credit to John Goldberger, page 22/23)
I agree with @DirtyDozen12 about the hour and minute hands, I think originally there must have been "breguet antique" hands or maybe "cathedral" hands.
Thx for the info... meantime I spent the money on an Omega constellation fm 70
 
Posts
422
Likes
880
Id say the movement is a 15.26. I have a gold 15.26 from 1938 with similar hands.