Longines 13ZN ref. 5415: three dial variants

Posts
2,793
Likes
4,841
I was recently looking at examples of ref. 5415, and noticed that there is some variation in the 'basic' dials. By 'basic', I mean dials without radium or tachymeter/telemeter scales. This style of dial is common in ref. 5415.

The first major difference I noticed is the hour markers. The first two examples below have what I will call 'wide' numerals. The third example has 'narrow' numerals. This is particularly evident when viewing the zero of the "10" marker.

The second major difference is the outer scale. The first example has more rounded 3s and 5s, and 'larger' 4s. The second and third examples have 'flatter' 3s and 5s, and 'smaller' 4s.

So far, I have observed three distinct variants: (1) wide 10 marker with small 4s, (2) wide 10 marker with large 4s, and (3) narrow 10 marker with large 4s.

Type 1

Source: https://www.carsandwatches.com/watches/rare-longines-13zn-doppio-linguetta


Type 2

Source: https://curious-curio.jp/watch/36519

Type 3

Source: https://www.bukowskis.com/en/auctions/630/44-longines-flyback-chronograph
 
Posts
1,610
Likes
3,825
in the first one some numerals bleed in the subdials (10 and 2 in particular). As it does not feels like a top quality dial like the other two, is it possibly an old redial?
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,237
A few things I noticed:

The indices are cut cleanly off the subdial on one example and bleed over on another. (sorry, I see that S.H. noticed this, too).

Also, the subdial ink seems thicker on the bottom (especially at 40 and 20).

Lastly, and this is a somewhat dubious claim - but the subdial of the top one seems to have more empty space on the edge.
.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,632
Likes
14,546
Adding mine. Type 2 and I believe the bleeding into the sub dial isn't indicative of a redial, given the history.

Edited:
 
Posts
2,793
Likes
4,841
@S.H., @Modest_Proposal, and @khmt2 Thanks for your input.

At present, I do not associate the overlapping printing with a refinish on these dials. I have seen it on a few examples, including watches that were in excellent overall condition. As well, the rest of the printing (e.g. signature font, outer scale font, hour numerals) appeared to match original dials with no overlap.

@Modest_Proposal I agree, there seems to be variation in both line thickness and space around the sub-dial printing. However, I think that this variation is within the expected tolerances for these dials. I will mention that the Curious Curio dial (Type 2) has a white dial foot, which I find intriguing.
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,237
@S.H., @Modest_Proposal, and @khmt2 Thanks for your input.

At present, I do not associate the overlapping printing with a refinish on these dials. I have seen it on a few examples, including watches that were in excellent overall condition. As well, the rest of the printing (e.g. signature font, outer scale font, hour numerals) appeared to match original dials with no overlap.

@Modest_Proposal I agree, there seems to be variation in both line thickness and space around the sub-dial printing. However, I think that this variation is within the expected tolerances for these dials. I will mention that the Curious Curio dial (Type 2) has a white dial foot, which I find intriguing.

To clarify, I don't think these differences suggest a redial.
 
Posts
1,610
Likes
3,825
Interesting! We are so used to sterile flawless modern dials...

I must keep in mind that one of the worst misaligned minute track l have ever seen was on an original 1950s Rolex step dial, so why not some overlap on a Longines dial indeed.
 
Posts
2,793
Likes
4,841
I must keep in mind that one of the worst misaligned minute track l have ever seen was on an original 1950s Rolex step dial, so why not some overlap on a Longines dial indeed.
I would say that Longines dials from the 1940s are among the most consistent and well-executed. Longines dials with this sort of overlap are in the minority.
 
Posts
14
Likes
32
Adding mine. Type 2 and I believe the bleeding into the sub dial isn't indicative of a redial, given the history.


Absolute stunner.
 
Posts
430
Likes
738
Adding mine. Type 2 and I believe the bleeding into the sub dial isn't indicative of a redial, given the history.

Doesn't get much better than that....