Forums Latest Members
  1. minutenrohr Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,465
    One of the last "regular" 13ZN (7,37) showing a non-flyback movement (and a nice red dial foot) - just for entertainmaent:
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. dodo44 Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    242
    Likes
    268
    Lovely! I have not seen many from that period with any marking on the outside of the case back.
     
  3. minutenrohr Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,465
    Thank you. I believe, from 1944 it´s almost common, but only the waterproof cases. F.i. 23485, 23020, 21521, 23432 + 23086. Earlier waterproof models sometimes, sometimes not. I looked for that in Goldbergers Longines book.
     
    JohnLy and dodo44 like this.
  4. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    A lovely "doppia linguetta". I am curious as to why Longines went with this snap-on caseback design when they had already done the tre and sei tacche.
     
  5. minutenrohr Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,465
    I would be pleased, if it had a tre tacche. Perhaps it was cheaper to produce a press on?
     
  6. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    Yes, I think that cost was certainly a factor. I also wonder why this design was not used on more watches. Did it ever appear on non-chronograph models? Also, are there any gaskets? It seems as though the protruding "ring" on the caseback simply mates with the groove in the periphery of the main case.
     
  7. minutenrohr Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,465
    I don´t know non-chronos with that double tongue. My watch has no gasket because the watchmaker threw it in the garbadge can when he serviced it. Others have one (never saw a tin gasket, originally it seems to be a fawn colored kind of rubber) and it lies in the groove you mentioned.
     
  8. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    JohnLy and Waltesefalcon like this.
  9. minutenrohr Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,465
    Correct - it´s lead not tin. Tin becomes "powder" below zero degrees. I forgot about that...
    I don´t know when Longines began to use modern materials for their gaskets.
    I wish they had not. I think lead is better concerning the disposal of humidity (?).
    Probably there are fawn AND grey gaskets.
     
    Edited Oct 24, 2016
  10. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Oct 24, 2016

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    Edited Oct 24, 2016
  11. JimJupiter Apr 1, 2024

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    Hey guys, I promised a guy from the German Uhrforum to show you his watches, another similar example and ask some questions for him :D I really dont like to be a gravedigger, but this 8 years old post, looks to be the best place :D

    Ok, lets start with the watch, that started the discussion in the German Forum:

    IMG_0571.jpg
    IMG_0568.jpg IMG_0564.jpg IMG_0563.jpg


    The owner of the watch asked Longines for the authenticity and they answered the watch has a dial swap. The story could end here, but another guy (the one I was in contact with) chimed in, who bought two other "Doppia Linguetta" 40 (!) years ago from a guy who bought them himself in the US. Both have the same dial as the first watch:

    P1110616.JPG P1110617.JPG Longines 1.jpg Longines 2.jpg

    So according to my own rule, if you find three similar watches they should be most likely legit, shouldnt they?
    His theory is, that maybe an airline used and modified them (Longines also answered him regarding his watches that they were sold in the US and the dial is swapped).

    Also interesting are the numbers on the caseback, that are relatively close together. So kind of an marking,...of an airline, military, any other user? Maybe some of you guys know more and could help here.

    Thanks in advance,

    Nico
     
    GuiltunderGlass and Mark020 like this.
  12. Radiumpassion Apr 1, 2024

    Posts
    1,049
    Likes
    5,374
    All these three watches are different ref numbers IMO The bottom one looks like a
    5415 but I have never seen that order number before, interesting.
     
    Mark020 and JimJupiter like this.
  13. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Apr 2, 2024

    Posts
    2,686
    Likes
    4,618
    Thanks for sharing these watches, @JimJupiter

    As @Radiumpassion stated, these three 13ZN examples are not entirely comparable. The first example appears to be reference 4813, whereas the second two look like reference 5415. Also, Longines' statement that the dial(s) has been replaced is likely based on a note in their records about an attribute of the original dial (e.g., silver dial with tachymeter scale). It seems possible that their records do not perfectly correspond to reality, but unlikely in the vast majority of cases.

    I am intrigued by the numbers on the outside of the case-backs.
     
  14. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer Apr 2, 2024

    Posts
    4,739
    Likes
    6,747
    Me too. They must be some kind on inventory number
     
    JimJupiter and DirtyDozen12 like this.
  15. minutenrohr Apr 15, 2024

    Posts
    1,884
    Likes
    23,465
    JimJupiter likes this.
  16. JimJupiter Apr 15, 2024

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    Fortunately its not the watch from the guy who ask me to show them here ;)