Likelihood of a smaller Speedmaster Racing 9900?

Posts
23
Likes
4
Hi All,

I am intrigued by the Speedmaster Racing 9900 329.30.44.51.01.001 and have been for quite a bit of time. However, the 44.25mm diameter is quite large and I would prefer this to be 42mm as per the Speedmaster Professional (same lug to lug as well) and I believe I am not the only one. If I am nitpicking, I would also want to get the dial from Speedmaster DSOTM or any sort of ZRO2 dial in black. Also, since this was released in 2017, would it be possible that the Speedmaster Racing is due for an update?

Also 100m of WR as per the Moonphase Chronos. There is a lack of a direct competitor with the Daytona as the Speedmaster is a manual wind and this mostly only appeals to enthusiasts.

This would make it the perfect Speedmaster for daily wear. Also considering an IWC Pilot Chronograph 41
 
Posts
33,477
Likes
38,177
So aside from this line of Speedmaster racing, there used to be another line, also called the Speedmaster racing that was a 39mm or so automatic powered by Calibre 3330. That line has now been ended effectively and folded into another line called the Speedmaster 38 which is a unisex line for people with smaller wrists and contains both more feminine looking designs as well as racing and moonwatch inspired designs.

You don’t get the 9900 movement but the 3330 is very good as well, a Co-Axial automatic with a column wheel chronograph, and the price is drastically less. Given that I have a feeling the Speedy 38 will continue to remain their small / entry level offering for some time at least.

So there’s this, the 324.30.38.50.01.001



And this, the more racing inspired 324.32.38.50.06.001

 
Posts
23
Likes
4
Hi All,

I am intrigued by the Speedmaster Racing 9900 329.30.44.51.01.001 and have been for quite a bit of time. However, the 44.25mm diameter is quite large and I would prefer this to be 42mm as per the Speedmaster Professional (same lug to lug as well) and I believe I am not the only one. If I am nitpicking, I would also want to get the dial from Speedmaster DSOTM or any sort of ZRO2 dial in black. Also, since this was released in 2017, would it be possible that the Speedmaster Racing is due for an update?

Also 100m of WR as per the Moonphase Chronos. There is a lack of a direct competitor with the Daytona as the Speedmaster is a manual wind and this mostly only appeals to enthusiasts.

This would make it the perfect Speedmaster for daily wear. Also considering an IWC Pilot Chronograph 41

I have been looking into the movement sizes of the Professional's 3861 and the Racing's 9900 and the dimensions line up relatively well.

3861: 37mm Dia x 6.87 thk
9900: 32.5mm Dia x 7.6mm

Source:
https://millenarywatches.com/omega-caliber-9900/
https://millenarywatches.com/omega-caliber-3861/
 
Posts
23
Likes
4
So aside from this line of Speedmaster racing, there used to be another line, also called the Speedmaster racing that was a 39mm or so automatic powered by Calibre 3330. That line has now been ended effectively and folded into another line called the Speedmaster 38 which is a unisex line for people with smaller wrists and contains both more feminine looking designs as well as racing and moonwatch inspired designs.

You don’t get the 9900 movement but the 3330 is very good as well, a Co-Axial automatic with a column wheel chronograph, and the price is drastically less. Given that I have a feeling the Speedy 38 will continue to remain their small / entry level offering for some time at least.

So there’s this, the 324.30.38.50.01.001



And this, the more racing inspired 324.32.38.50.06.001


Ah yes, I am aware of this line but I just feel like this line is more of a lower end product compared to the 9900 Racing. I absolutely love the 9900 but I am unsure how it would fit on my 6.75in wrists. The Speedmaster 38 just does not speak to me. It feels a bit undercooked and just does not spark any sort of excitement for me unfortunately. I do love the caseback of the 9900 and it is no doubt an engineering marvel at this price point.
 
Posts
126
Likes
245
Ah yes, I am aware of this line but I just feel like this line is more of a lower end product compared to the 9900 Racing. I absolutely love the 9900 but I am unsure how it would fit on my 6.75in wrists. The Speedmaster 38 just does not speak to me. It feels a bit undercooked and just does not spark any sort of excitement for me unfortunately. I do love the caseback of the 9900 and it is no doubt an engineering marvel at this price point.

My wrist is the same size. I've never felt it was too big but definitely close to the limit IMO.
 
Posts
23
Likes
4
My wrist is the same size. I've never felt it was too big but definitely close to the limit IMO.

Oh this looks absolutely perfect! I have a feeling that this model will be getting updated next year as it appears Omega updates the Speedmaster Racing and the SMP300 every 6 years (I am planning to buy mid year next year regardless). But this leviates any concerns regarding sizing due to the lug to lug. Thanks for that!

How do you find the 9900? I am tossing up regarding the white dial and the black dial similar to the OG Moonwatch
 
Posts
126
Likes
245
How do you find the 9900? I am tossing up regarding the white dial and the black dial similar to the OG Moonwatch

I wear it 3-5 times/week so I like it a lot. If I had to pick one thing to improve it would be a reduction in thickness.
 
Posts
56
Likes
124
Hi All,

I am intrigued by the Speedmaster Racing 9900 329.30.44.51.01.001 and have been for quite a bit of time. However, the 44.25mm diameter is quite large and I would prefer this to be 42mm as per the Speedmaster Professional (same lug to lug as well) and I believe I am not the only one. If I am nitpicking, I would also want to get the dial from Speedmaster DSOTM or any sort of ZRO2 dial in black. Also, since this was released in 2017, would it be possible that the Speedmaster Racing is due for an update?

Also 100m of WR as per the Moonphase Chronos. There is a lack of a direct competitor with the Daytona as the Speedmaster is a manual wind and this mostly only appeals to enthusiasts.

This would make it the perfect Speedmaster for daily wear. Also considering an IWC Pilot Chronograph 41

The 44mm diameter is misleading because of the crown guard bulge. It's really more of a 40mm watch, and wears like it. It is my daily watch, and I find it to be quite comfortable. That said, you should try one on for yourself.
 
Posts
1,438
Likes
2,213
My wrist is the same size. I've never felt it was too big but definitely close to the limit IMO.

I owned one of these -- it was my first Omega -- and while it wasn't too large for my 7" flat wrist, it was too high. I could never get it to "sit" right and eventually swapped it for a FOIS which I've worn happily ever since.

It's a terrific watch, and I loved the legibility, pusher action and accuracy, but couldn't get past the wrist wobble. I have looked a few times at the 3300-based Racings, and may yet pick one up, but the new hand-wound '57s seem to be the logical heirs of the 9900 designs.
 
Posts
110
Likes
83
My wrist is the same size. I've never felt it was too big but definitely close to the limit IMO.
Looks perfect....
 
Posts
10,302
Likes
16,124
I have been looking into the movement sizes of the Professional's 3861 and the Racing's 9900 and the dimensions line up relatively well.

3861: 37mm Dia x 6.87 thk
9900: 32.5mm Dia x 7.6mm

Source:
https://millenarywatches.com/omega-caliber-9900/
https://millenarywatches.com/omega-caliber-3861/
The 321/861/1861 and 3861 are in fact only 27mm wide. Your source is wrong. The 34mm case chronostop used the 865 so you can make a very small chrono with those.

The 9900 is a beast vs the much smaller 3861 or 3313 or 3330 used on other Omega chrono models. I’m not a big fan of the watches that use it for this reason. The smallest Onega using a 9900 family movement seems to be the 40.5mm 2 register Speedmaster ‘57 model. That looks like a slightly scaled up FOIS ie a straight lug and is as small as you will find for a 99XX, I can’t see how they can go smaller. If you look at the display caseback of one of those the movement is crammed in and nearly touches the sides. They are slim though as they have no winding rotor.
Edited:
 
Posts
23
Likes
4
The 44mm diameter is misleading because of the crown guard bulge. It's really more of a 40mm watch, and wears like it. It is my daily watch, and I find it to be quite comfortable. That said, you should try one on for yourself.
Would you have calipers to measure the actual diameter of the case minus the pushers? I am aware Omega does take measurements at unusual angles
 
Posts
23
Likes
4
The 321/861/1861 and 3861 are in fact only 27mm wide. Your source is wrong. The 34mm case chronostop used the 865 so you can make a very small chrono with those.

The 9900 is a beast vs the much smaller 3861 or 3313 or 3330 used on other Omega chrono models. I’m not a big fan of the watches that use it for this reason. The smallest Onega using a 9900 family movement seems to be the 40.5mm 2 register Speedmaster ‘57 model. That looks like a slightly scaled up FOIS ie a straight lug and is as small as you will find for a 99XX, I can’t see how they can go smaller. If you look at the display caseback of one of those the movement is crammed in and nearly touches the sides. They are slim though as they have no winding rotor.

Thanks for your comment. That makes quite a bit difference between the dimensions of the 9900 and the 3861 and hence reflected in the case dimensions.

The updated 57 uses the 9900 but it's a mechanical movement hence it's in the middle ground between the ultra modern automatics and the traditional mechanical watches. I really do hope Omega doesn't spread this to the updated DSOTM and the Racing as this would kill the entire prospects for a Daytona competitor or in general a automatic chronograph from Omega. I understand the complexities of the Co-Axial movemenent and it being automatic is a bit difficult to squeeze but I would rather see an updated 44.25 case than have it be removed all together. The Speedy 57 is a reissue of the first iteration of the Speedy so it made sense for this model to have a mechanical movement rather than the previous 57 which featured the 9300 as per the DSOTM. Fingers crossed they don't throw the entire automatic chronograph line out