Let’s see your “jumbo” beefy lug Seamasters

Posts
1,490
Likes
5,749
Well used 2494 😀

With RG regulator?
 
Posts
3,188
Likes
12,573
That reminded me to add this example, also a 2657 😀

Edited:
 
Posts
1,490
Likes
5,749
Have I summarized things correctly?
No!
The original specification by @seekingseaquest did not mention "Seamaster" which is nice as tomorrow I will post a contender meeting the demands but with no Seamaster on the dial 😁
 
Posts
3,188
Likes
12,573
No!
The original specification by @seekingseaquest did not mention "Seamaster" which is nice as tomorrow I will post a contender meeting the demands but with no Seamaster on the dial 😁

Well, there are a few contenders that are Seamasters, even though it doesn't say so on the dial 😀
 
Posts
4,607
Likes
11,670
No!
The original specification by @seekingseaquest did not mention "Seamaster" which is nice as tomorrow I will post a contender meeting the demands but with no Seamaster on the dial 😁

The title of the thread suggests otherwise.
 
Posts
1,490
Likes
5,749
The title of the thread suggests otherwise.
True! I am not versed in the early Seamaster history, but @MtV seems to know a thing or two about nameless Seamasters.
My fellow countryman calls this 2493-4 cal. 332 bumper from 1950 a "Premaster" - I guess he means that it is a Seamaster predecessor?

Anyway, it is a true 36.3mm jumbo with beefy lugs. I just picked it up from service, with a new mainspring fitted. The watchmaker was able to polish the wonderfully shallow crystal!

 
Posts
3,188
Likes
12,573
Let the vintage archives speak:


Very nice example, this - and I doubt anyone here would argue that this isn’t a Seamaster. It’ll simply be a pre-1950 example, build before the model name found it’s way on the dial.
 
Posts
2,502
Likes
6,562
True! I am not versed in the early Seamaster history, but @MtV seems to know a thing or two about nameless Seamasters.
My fellow countryman calls this 2493-4 cal. 332 bumper from 1950 a "Premaster" - I guess he means that it is a Seamaster predecessor?

Anyway, it is a true 36.3mm jumbo with beefy lugs. I just picked it up from service, with a new mainspring fitted. The watchmaker was able to polish the wonderfully shallow crystal!

Beauty!

There are lots of ads from the era that advertise them as Seamasters despite showing watches with no Seamaster text on the dial.
 
Posts
1,490
Likes
5,749
MtV MtV
Let the vintage archives speak:


Very nice example, this - and I doubt anyone here would argue that this isn’t a Seamaster. It’ll simply be a pre-1950 example, build before the model name found it’s way on the dial.

Thanks, @MtV and @seekingseaquest , I am really fond of it, two-tone dial, printed numerals and all.
 
Posts
657
Likes
7,204
Thanks to @seekingseaquest, this stunner is on my wrist today. Of course, the story of the delivered then missing parcel (picked up inadvertently by another courier moments after delivery, super fun to track down) will become part of the tale. And boy, what a difference 2mm makes!
Coincidentally, I was looking at trading a couple of older watches for a Grand Seiko SBGW231, that has a very similar vibe. No need now!
 
Posts
2,502
Likes
6,562
Thanks to @seekingseaquest, this stunner is on my wrist today. Of course, the story of the delivered then missing parcel (picked up inadvertently by another courier moments after delivery, super fun to track down) will become part of the tale. And boy, what a difference 2mm makes!
Looks great, I had a feeling this one would be nice in hand..

I'm hedging my bets here.

First a cal 354 sold to me by the redoubtable @seekingseaquest

And a 1950 cal 351 'Premaster' 😉
Not jumbos though
 
Posts
7,381
Likes
58,879
Looks great, I had a feeling this one would be nice in hand..


Not jumbos though
Ooops. Just saw the beefy lugs bit 😀
 
Posts
3,627
Likes
6,103
Just got this 2992 Seamaster back from service..

I have two 2992, both have different fonts on them, and different from yours, too. 😁

 
Posts
2,502
Likes
6,562
Another addition to the collection - a 1949 2493 reference in a rose gold capped case and with very uncommon raised arabic numerals and leaf hands. This is not a well documented subject but I believe these hands are original to 2493/2494 refs with these raised arabic numerals.. and oddly it seems only this marker style. I can create a thread on the subject if others are interested.

Edited:
 
Posts
214
Likes
1,245
Finally joined the club with this gold capped, black waffle, 2494. It aint perfect but damn its jumped to being one of my favorite in my whole collection instantly... a keeper for life.

Shown next to another black waffle I acquired this year, a non-jumbo beefy lug 2577.
 
Posts
1,687
Likes
3,463
its jumped to being one of my favorite in my whole collection instantly... a keeper for life
Now that is special. Putting it right alongside another watch that, in most company, would be admired, just brings it home. Enjoy!