Let’s see your “jumbo” beefy lug Seamasters

Posts
1,542
Likes
5,973
Well used 2494 😀

With RG regulator?
 
Posts
3,219
Likes
12,674
That reminded me to add this example, also a 2657 😀

Edited:
 
Posts
1,542
Likes
5,973
Have I summarized things correctly?
No!
The original specification by @seekingseaquest did not mention "Seamaster" which is nice as tomorrow I will post a contender meeting the demands but with no Seamaster on the dial 😁
 
Posts
3,219
Likes
12,674
No!
The original specification by @seekingseaquest did not mention "Seamaster" which is nice as tomorrow I will post a contender meeting the demands but with no Seamaster on the dial 😁

Well, there are a few contenders that are Seamasters, even though it doesn't say so on the dial 😀
 
Posts
4,692
Likes
11,839
No!
The original specification by @seekingseaquest did not mention "Seamaster" which is nice as tomorrow I will post a contender meeting the demands but with no Seamaster on the dial 😁

The title of the thread suggests otherwise.
 
Posts
1,542
Likes
5,973
The title of the thread suggests otherwise.
True! I am not versed in the early Seamaster history, but @MtV seems to know a thing or two about nameless Seamasters.
My fellow countryman calls this 2493-4 cal. 332 bumper from 1950 a "Premaster" - I guess he means that it is a Seamaster predecessor?

Anyway, it is a true 36.3mm jumbo with beefy lugs. I just picked it up from service, with a new mainspring fitted. The watchmaker was able to polish the wonderfully shallow crystal!

 
Posts
3,219
Likes
12,674
Let the vintage archives speak:


Very nice example, this - and I doubt anyone here would argue that this isn’t a Seamaster. It’ll simply be a pre-1950 example, build before the model name found it’s way on the dial.
 
Posts
2,581
Likes
6,656
True! I am not versed in the early Seamaster history, but @MtV seems to know a thing or two about nameless Seamasters.
My fellow countryman calls this 2493-4 cal. 332 bumper from 1950 a "Premaster" - I guess he means that it is a Seamaster predecessor?

Anyway, it is a true 36.3mm jumbo with beefy lugs. I just picked it up from service, with a new mainspring fitted. The watchmaker was able to polish the wonderfully shallow crystal!

Beauty!

There are lots of ads from the era that advertise them as Seamasters despite showing watches with no Seamaster text on the dial.
 
Posts
1,542
Likes
5,973
MtV MtV
Let the vintage archives speak:


Very nice example, this - and I doubt anyone here would argue that this isn’t a Seamaster. It’ll simply be a pre-1950 example, build before the model name found it’s way on the dial.

Thanks, @MtV and @seekingseaquest , I am really fond of it, two-tone dial, printed numerals and all.
 
Posts
660
Likes
7,217
Thanks to @seekingseaquest, this stunner is on my wrist today. Of course, the story of the delivered then missing parcel (picked up inadvertently by another courier moments after delivery, super fun to track down) will become part of the tale. And boy, what a difference 2mm makes!
Coincidentally, I was looking at trading a couple of older watches for a Grand Seiko SBGW231, that has a very similar vibe. No need now!
 
Posts
2,581
Likes
6,656
Thanks to @seekingseaquest, this stunner is on my wrist today. Of course, the story of the delivered then missing parcel (picked up inadvertently by another courier moments after delivery, super fun to track down) will become part of the tale. And boy, what a difference 2mm makes!
Looks great, I had a feeling this one would be nice in hand..

I'm hedging my bets here.

First a cal 354 sold to me by the redoubtable @seekingseaquest

And a 1950 cal 351 'Premaster' 😉
Not jumbos though
 
Posts
7,568
Likes
60,701
Looks great, I had a feeling this one would be nice in hand..


Not jumbos though
Ooops. Just saw the beefy lugs bit 😀
 
Posts
3,650
Likes
6,176
Just got this 2992 Seamaster back from service..

I have two 2992, both have different fonts on them, and different from yours, too. 😁

 
Posts
2,581
Likes
6,656
Another addition to the collection - a 1949 2493 reference in a rose gold capped case and with very uncommon raised arabic numerals and leaf hands. This is not a well documented subject but I believe these hands are original to 2493/2494 refs with these raised arabic numerals.. and oddly it seems only this marker style. I can create a thread on the subject if others are interested.

Edited:
 
Posts
221
Likes
1,262
Finally joined the club with this gold capped, black waffle, 2494. It aint perfect but damn its jumped to being one of my favorite in my whole collection instantly... a keeper for life.

Shown next to another black waffle I acquired this year, a non-jumbo beefy lug 2577.
 
Posts
1,721
Likes
3,533
its jumped to being one of my favorite in my whole collection instantly... a keeper for life
Now that is special. Putting it right alongside another watch that, in most company, would be admired, just brings it home. Enjoy!