Large black Omega watch - any value?

Posts
2,318
Likes
19,739
The "neck of a goose" is a Reed's Regulator, it's used to speed up or slow down the watch by changing the effective length of the hairspring.

You are lucky to have one in such good condition, they are often broken (no goose neck), missing the adjusting screw, or missing completely with only two holes in the cock to indicate where it used to live.

The OXG stamp is also interesting when I look at all of the other pictures, but it's a puzzle beyond my capability.

PS: Did you happen to notice of there is an unusual case maker's stamp inside the lid that fits to the back of the watch?

OXG would indicate delivery to the US.

Art
 
Posts
16,747
Likes
35,108
OXG would indicate delivery to the US.

Art

Yes I know, but a Swiss case? Is that a bit unusual?

CK 2777?

With spring bars?
 
Posts
2,318
Likes
19,739
Yes I know, but a Swiss case? Is that a bit unusual?

With spring bars?

Yes, decidedly so.

The spring bars are also unusual, but my sense is it's tied somehow to the regulator, which would also be a bit of a mystery if it is indeed a CK 2777.

Let's see how this plays out. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a deeper meaning to Erich's thread.
 
Posts
3,413
Likes
7,319
2777 - 2 Railmaster?

BINGO! 👍👍👍

I wonder that it took so long until somebody solved the puzzle although I showed all the crucial parts to identify it correctly.



It is a birthday present I bought myself... these are presents we can really enjoy as we know what we long for, not some useless stuff we get sometimes from people who are clueless about what to gift....

Its now united with its brother, the "white elephant" 😀
Edited:
 
Posts
546
Likes
1,421
CK 2777?
Well done @Dr No ! But we’re not there yet.

I have a 2777-1 thin arrow and I show here comparisons with Erich’s dial and balance images. The dial looks OK. The balance is the first problem. And then we move onto the OXG – because (AFAIK) the 2777-1 was supplied to the RAF, and the OXG would therefore not fit.

The 2777-1 had fixed lugs and Erich’s has spring bars.

So it must be a later derivative. And Erich will therefore tell us that it’s very valuable.

Please finish it off somebody. Tom
 
Posts
546
Likes
1,421
Sorry, I crossed with Erich's. I still think there are unanswered questions!
 
Posts
3,413
Likes
7,319
Sorry, I crossed with Erich's. I still think there are unanswered questions!
Tom,

you have done a well-thought analysis indeed! It show´s the "scientist" in you 👍
 
Posts
16,747
Likes
35,108
Can someone explain the OXG for me?

Is it simply that the complete watch was imported into the US, rather than just a movement as was generally the usual case at the time.
 
Posts
3,413
Likes
7,319
Can someone explain the OXG for me?

Is it simply that the complete watch was imported into the US, rather than just a movement as was generally the usual case at the time.

Yes, obviously the complete watch
Edited:
 
Posts
16,747
Likes
35,108
Yes, obviously the complete watch

👍

And a nice new avatar as well 😁.
 
Posts
778
Likes
2,442
OXG - 2777- 2 😀
d4c03708-6d7f-42f6-b16c-8459dab5bde6-jpeg.620826
https://omegaforums.net/threads/2777-2-on-ebay.81851/
OK- same watch!😗
tamura
Edited:
 
Posts
586
Likes
765
I do not think the 2777-2 were necessarily assigned and have fived bars, they were supposed to be a prototype, perhaps to test the civilian market. Can't see why they should not have gone to US.

Cannot easily see the soft iron antimagnetic case in the OXG, is it there?

Here is another OXG, only 2 serial numbers away:

Edited:
 
Posts
3,413
Likes
7,319
I do not think the 2777-2 were necessarily assigned and have fived bars, they were supposed to be a prototype, perhaps to test the civilian market. Can't see why they should not have gone to US.

Cannot easily see the soft iron antimagnetic case in the OXG, is it there?

Here is another OXG, only 2 serial numbers away:


Hi Franco,

yes, all there: iron cage, including iron movement holder ring, inner iron case back with the holding spring, 1 mm thick iron dial...
there have been few of these recognized and called "Railmaster prototypes"
 
Posts
2,318
Likes
19,739
Well done @Dr No ! But we’re not there yet.

I have a 2777-1 thin arrow and I show here comparisons with Erich’s dial and balance images. The dial looks OK. The balance is the first problem. And then we move onto the OXG – because (AFAIK) the 2777-1 was supplied to the RAF, and the OXG would therefore not fit.

The 2777-1 had fixed lugs and Erich’s has spring bars.

So it must be a later derivative. And Erich will therefore tell us that it’s very valuable.

Please finish it off somebody. Tom

My hunch was informed by a post of Bill's many years ago on the Omega forum I now moderate.

https://www.watchprosite.com/page-wf.forumpost/fi-677/ti-401491/dv-true/wf.responses.open_bLoB_s-0/

😉