Just bought this ref. 166.002

Posts
5
Likes
9
Hello everyone,

I just bought a Seamaster ref. 166.002.
I paid it 350€. It seems to be very precise since I measured +6 secs/day.
Do you think It need to be serviced?
Opinions and comments are welcome!

thank you!
Edited:
 
Posts
760
Likes
807
If you want to keep it and care about the longevity of the watch, then yes you should probably get it serviced. Who knows how long it has been since it was serviced.
 
Posts
227
Likes
791
Yes it needs to be serviced uness you are sure that it has been serviced recently .
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,995
Get it serviced. If you buy a used car without knowing it’s service history, it’s smart to get the oil/fluids changed just as a matter of starting with a baseline.

A good independent watchmaker should be able to service these movements- if service parts are needed, they will need an Omega parts account so it’s wise to find a watchmaker with an account or access to genuine factory parts.
 
Posts
8,661
Likes
71,724
Congratulations. A classic Seamaster in lovely condition and at a bargain price 😀
 
Posts
232
Likes
247
Congrats mate, what a nice piece especially for that price😁
 
Posts
456
Likes
796
It is of course your call re: service, but from a purely cost/benefit standpoint, I will take the contrary position. You bought this watch as a bargain. As long as it is keeping reasonable time, it does not make sense to spend $300 for preventive maintenance on a $425 watch.
 
Posts
328
Likes
441
Well done; an honest if modest stainless Seamaster from a renowned period and containing a renowned movement. I see a lot of hasty purchase mistakes here on OF, but this is not one of them. Get it serviced (but not polished) by a qualified watchmaker and enjoy it for many years.
 
Posts
5
Likes
9
Thank you all for your replies and advices. I will get it serviced as soon as possible.
 
Posts
8,661
Likes
71,724
It is of course your call re: service, but from a purely cost/benefit standpoint, I will take the contrary position. You bought this watch as a bargain. As long as it is keeping reasonable time, it does not make sense to spend $300 for preventive maintenance on a $425 watch.
I entirely accept your logic but it’s based on a false premise.

Although the OP bought the watch for only €350 it looks to be excellent condition. A service should cost about €150 (give or take).

Because it is a collectible watch it already has a much higher resale value and if it is cared for properly that will be maintained or increased.

Your argument, and I’m afraid I’m guilty of using hyperbole, seems to be that if you find a genuine Rembrandt in a junk shop or flea market and pay only £100 for it, it would be foolish to have it restored or pay for an insurance premium because it’s only worth £100. 😕
 
Posts
368
Likes
253
Great bargain mate! Congrats on a new watch! I have the same reference but goldplated and it brings me joy every time I wear it!

 
Posts
911
Likes
4,393
I entirely accept your logic but it’s based on a false premise.

Although the OP bought the watch for only €350 it looks to be excellent condition. A service should cost about €150 (give or take).

Because it is a collectible watch it already has a much higher resale value and if it is cared for properly that will be maintained or increased.

Your argument, and I’m afraid I’m guilty of using hyperbole, seems to be that if you find a genuine Rembrandt in a junk shop or flea market and pay only £100 for it, it would be foolish to have it restored or pay for an insurance premium because it’s only worth £100. 😕
Agreed. A couple of watches that I have bought at bargain prices have cost more to service than I paid, but you are preserving the longevity of the watch and getting the peace of mind to be able to wear it daily.

I love the watch, @marcowip - you have scored a truly versatile, elegant slice of vintage Omega's golden era. Wear her in good health (once serviced)!
Edited:
 
Posts
5
Likes
9
Great bargain mate! Congrats on a new watch! I have the same reference but goldplated and it brings me joy every time I wear it!


Beautiful, but why do I have a magnifier on the date and you don’t?
Furthermore, I see that yours has a Geneve text on the dial. Is it the same reference than mine?
Edited:
 
Posts
456
Likes
796
I entirely accept your logic but it’s based on a false premise.

Although the OP bought the watch for only €350 it looks to be excellent condition. A service should cost about €150 (give or take).

Because it is a collectible watch it already has a much higher resale value and if it is cared for properly that will be maintained or increased.

Your argument, and I’m afraid I’m guilty of using hyperbole, seems to be that if you find a genuine Rembrandt in a junk shop or flea market and pay only £100 for it, it would be foolish to have it restored or pay for an insurance premium because it’s only worth £100. 😕
Not sure what "false premise" you are referring to, but your example has nothing to do with my argument, which boils down to this: the benefit of spending several hundred dollars for preventive maintenance on a $425 watch (which by definition is working reasonably well) does not out weigh the risk of not doing the preventive maintenance. I'm not suggesting the watch should be completely neglected, just wait until it is having a problem before spending additional $ on it and in the long run you will come out ahead.
 
Posts
8,661
Likes
71,724
Not sure what "false premise" you are referring to, but your example has nothing to do with my argument, which boils down to this: the benefit of spending several hundred dollars for preventive maintenance on a $425 watch (which by definition is working reasonably well) does not out weigh the risk of not doing the preventive maintenance. I'm not suggesting the watch should be completely neglected, just wait until it is having a problem before spending additional $ on it and in the long run you will come out ahead.
Yes, that is what you said. I understood the first time you said it.