Is this the right case back for a gold-capped 168.005?

Posts
6
Likes
0
Hi everyone. Could you pls help identify whether this is a genuine case back for a gold-capped 168.005?

The perlage comprises overlapping circles, but it's not evenly applied across all of the case back. There're areas near the circumference that have no decoration. Should I be concerned?

Thanks in advance.
 
Posts
1,578
Likes
6,126
- and the outside?
 
Posts
5,690
Likes
8,828
It certainly looks poor, don’t remember seeing that before on a genuine case back.
It could have been somebody’s first day on ‘perlaging’. 😒
As @felsby says, more info please.
Pics of the outside, the case, the movt, the dial.
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
Thank you everyone. Sorry - here're the pics of the rest of the watch. Pics are from the seller.

Medallion is on the 4th pic.

The seller also says that the crown is accurate to the watch. But it looks 8-sided rather than 10-sided.

I posted about the crown earlier. Should I go remove that? Mods pls let me know. Thank you in advance.
 
Posts
252
Likes
506
At first glance I think the watch is genuine, the crown just seems very worn, the medallion looks real to me.
Movement too.
I would venture to say it's a genuine Omega.
 
Posts
16,747
Likes
35,109
QA/QC at that time wasn't the religion it is now so some parts got through.
Who knows. The polisher had a hangover? The inspector was in a hurry to get to the pub?

More importantly I think, are the signs of rotor rub on the caseback and on the rotor.
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
Thank you everyone.

QA/QC at that time wasn't the religion it is now so some parts got through.
More importantly I think, are the signs of rotor rub on the caseback and on the rotor.

Gosh how do you tell? I looked for scratches or scuffing but clearly I missed something...
 
Posts
1,578
Likes
6,126
There is some rotor rub, but new rotor bearings can be had, and maybe an adjustment will do.
Caseback and crown are original, as is the rest of the watch. No worries. I would say it is a decent watch that has seen some wrist time.
 
Posts
5,690
Likes
8,828
Watch looks genuine to me.
Just some iffy polishing in the caseback.

you can see the rotor rub on both the case back and around the edge of the movement.
It’s generally easily fixed.

I’d like to see some better, in-focus, straight-on, pics of the dial.
It looks correct but it doesn’t appear to pass the MOY test, so worth the extra scrutiny.
(Note: not all original Connie dials do pass the MOY test but it’s less commonly seen on doglegs)
 
Posts
1,578
Likes
6,126
.....
I’d like to see some better, in-focus, straight-on, pics of the dial.
It looks correct but it doesn’t appear to pass the MOY test, so worth the extra scrutiny.
(Note: not all original Connie dials do pass the MOY test but it’s less commonly seen on doglegs)
I think MOY may be OK: