Is this possible? 2782

Posts
844
Likes
1,487
I think this watch has too clean of a dial with some alignment issues and the print doesn't look right. Case is polished too.
But the serial number is off from what I know unless Omwga keep making them after 1954?
 
Posts
2,159
Likes
15,453
Aside of the very bad refinished dial and overpolished case, wrong crown and miss spelled chronometre the serial number on the movement is interesting. Maybe its a service part that was changed during a later service?
 
Posts
7,672
Likes
26,608
32m were made up to ~1970

no way that dial is original, though
 
Posts
844
Likes
1,487
Interesting...
I was quite certain it was a redial, but found that movement number to be strange.
No intention to bid on it, but I thought it worth of discussion here.
 
Posts
844
Likes
1,487
So somebody took a service part with no number and engraved the wrong number? Weird.
 
Posts
2,159
Likes
15,453
So somebody took a service part with no number and engraved the wrong number? Weird.
I was thinking the service part was engraved with this number and was produced much later than the watch.

Im not sure about the procedure when changing this type of movement parts with serial numbers, but was guessing they dont have a batch of 50s parts laying around to use.
But someone else here hopefully knows 😀
 
Posts
376
Likes
1,202
So we are looking at another "franken" watch..
 
Posts
1,501
Likes
2,569
The automatic bridge definitely looks like a service part to me. The grained finish more or less matches what you'd see on a 1010/1020 series or late 565.