- Posts
- 513
- Likes
- 956
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I'm going to vote the other way...I believe it is a relumed dial.
Why?
1. The lume material is too consistent, there is usually some variation, even in the most perfect of vintage dials when you examine very closely
2. The sweep hand has been replaced, yet, the lume at the tip is an exact match of the lume of the markers
3. Why didn't they do the hands... makes it look more authentic.
I may be wrong, but just my opinion and I await replies from those with more knowledge then myself.
My vote is relumed. For one it is too thick and though slightly, it is inconsistent.
I'm going to vote the other way...I believe it is a relumed dial.
Why?
1. The lume material is too consistent, there is usually some variation, even in the most perfect of vintage dials when you examine very closely
2. The sweep hand has been replaced, yet, the lume at the tip is an exact match of the lume of the markers
3. Why didn't they do the hands... makes it look more authentic.
I may be wrong, but just my opinion and I await replies from those with more knowledge then myself.
Do you have any movement and inner caseback pictures?
Crown is not correct
Very few stretch links on the barcelet (correct number should be 9) thats why they attatched a clasp extension
Too many things off... I'd pass on this watch. I realize an Ed White in great condition would be a lot more than 11K, but, you are making far too many compromises and asking a lot of questions. Are you set on buying an Ed White version of the Speedmaster? Are you willing to consider other versions of the Speedmaster?