Is this normal practice? Asking the watchmakers in here. Archer?

Posts
356
Likes
581
So I sent my Rolex 1503 to the watchmaker for service and he normally sends me back a pictorial review of the service. BUT in the pictures was this one picture. This seems to me like working on an expensive Lamborghini and stacking the parts on the hood before putting it back together. Is it normal practice to place the hands on the dial when servicing the movement? I’m praying my dial isn’t scratched. I don’t have it back from service yet. I would really value Archer or others opinions and practice of what they do during service.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,070
Likes
14,603
Yikes! I don’t like the look of that - fingers crossed
 
Posts
6,900
Likes
12,699
Don't they usually slide a thin plastic under the hands to remove these together ? 👎
Edit: video added... check at 3:25
.
Edited:
 
Posts
356
Likes
581
Don't they usually slide a thin plastic under the hands to remove these together ? 👎
Edit: video added... check at 3:25
.
Great video. I’m terrified about my watch now! Crap I need a drink.
 
Posts
1,615
Likes
3,861
It is probably not scratched, but that is asking for trouble indeed...
 
Posts
15,590
Likes
46,439
I would suggest this would not be standard practice, but done only for the purposes of the picture. If the watchmaker was capable of totally dismantling the watch and re-assembling it again without damaging anything, the likelihood of damage to the dial would be negligible.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
45,000
Years ago I brought my M5 into the shop for front end work- needed thrust arm bushing. The bolts were rusted on and I stupidly watched as they heated them with a torch (melted rubber dripping off) then whacked away with a mallet- I almost ran over crying yelling STOP!!! But they got them off with absolutely no damage done. I don’t watch them anymore.
 
Posts
618
Likes
928
I personally never do that even if there is very few chances that the dial be scratched but it increase the same probability when you use your tweezers to manipulate them...
 
Posts
1,145
Likes
1,463
Just wholly unnecessary. Zero reason to do that. I’d find a new watchmaker based on that one pic alone. There are PLENTY of fish in the sea.
 
Posts
10,857
Likes
53,592
Just wholly unnecessary. Zero reason to do that. I’d find a new watchmaker based on that one pic alone. There are PLENTY of fish in the sea.
I’d say the problem could arise when he picks up the hands with tweezers, although maybe he just turns it and they slide off. Still I have an older seamaster that acquired dings on the dial which looks like it could have happened by removal of the hands during service over the years. Why even take a chance.
 
Posts
2,720
Likes
5,552
When you see a dial with scratches and you ask yourself how would that ever be possible? I think the answer just revealed itself.
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,697
I never saw a Watchmaker do anything like that, and wouldn't be pleased, even if the risk to scratch the dial is pretty low.
 
Posts
148
Likes
160
That picture makes me nervous. I don't think this is standard practice at all...
 
Posts
2,453
Likes
7,057
I don’t think you ever want too see how the sausage is made.

or orthopedic surgery...
 
Posts
356
Likes
581
So true. Electric saws and drills. Hammers. On bone.
And they pretty much use standard power tools like you get at Home Depot.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
45,000
So true. Electric saws and drills. Hammers. On bone.

Ugh!! Change the topic!!!
sooo.....soap..