Is this a redial? Omega Seamaster 14k 105.004

lucreative · Nov 13, 2025

Hey OF members. I feel like a newbie for asking this, but I still have a hard time discerning, especially since it's a trusted seller. The seller says it's not a redial.

But is this Omega Seamaster 321 14k a redial? The font looks good, but really thick, and for this model I see a "T Swiss T", but many examples I don't see this. It's also a 34mm (edit seller says it's 35.5mm).

apsm100 · Nov 13, 2025

Do you have any more photos? I think the low resolution/compression of the image is making the print look thicker.

My gut says it's fine though.

omega1994 · Nov 13, 2025

it's legit to my eye.

omegawatchlover · Nov 13, 2025

Give it to me if you don’t want it

jimmyjay · Nov 14, 2025

I think it’s a refinished dial. The minute track looks wonky, especially at 6 o’clock.

myatt · Nov 14, 2025

Better photos would definitely help, but going by what is available, I do not believe this to be a redial. The 6 o'clock minute track could just be distortion from the crystal. From what I can see this is mostly likely the relatively scarce ref 105.001 (could be 105.004 too, but I don't seem to recollect having seen many of those in 14K Au) and that makes this one coeval as the Ed White Speedy reference 105.003. Just some trivia.

lucreative · Nov 14, 2025

He didn't have better dial pics for now, but he sent me pictures of the case back. He also said he was mistaken and the case is actually 35.5mm without crown. I made a deal to buy it "as is" since it's a 321 and 14k solid gold case. Will update with better pics when I take them myself. He's the one that sold me the Omega Racend Timer at a great price so I didn't want to push too hard.

lucreative · Nov 15, 2025

The seller sent this pic of the dial to me this morning. Any red flags?

Davidt · Nov 15, 2025

Dial looks original to me

lucreative · Nov 15, 2025

Davidt
Dial looks original to me

Actually, what sticks out to me from the sellers most recent picture to me is the sharpness of the 14k case. It'll hopefully be worth it just for that.

myatt · Nov 15, 2025

lucreative
The seller sent this pic of the dial to me this morning. Any red flags?

The dial is good, but the hour and minute hands are wrong IMHO. So I would not call this a untouched barn find as the H&M hands are from a much later reference or installed during previous service. Nonetheless the case being very sharp is a big plus.

lucreative · Tues. 4:44pm

Moment of truth. The watch arrived today and I found out it's a 105.004 in 14k per case back. Movement is beautiful and case seems sharp. How does the dial look and hands? It's a later 1965 watch per serial number lookup.

omega1994 · Tues. 5:38pm

Dial is original.

calalum · Tues. 7:53pm

As Larry David would say, pretty pretty nice.

lucreative · Tues. 8:12pm

What really got me was the sharp lugs. So hard to take a good pic to show them, but I will post a WRUW tomorrow.

myatt · Tues. 8:27pm

lucreative
Moment of truth. The watch arrived today and I found out it's a 105.004 in 14k per case back. Movement is beautiful and case seems sharp. How does the dial look and hands? It's a later 1965 watch per serial number lookup.

Beautiful! And I stand corrected wrt to the ref #. The caseback lack of bevel threw me in the 105.001 camp, but TIL something. Congrats on a great find.

Is this a redial? Omega Seamaster 14k 105.004

lucreative

apsm100

omega1994

omegawatchlover

jimmyjay

myatt

lucreative

lucreative

Davidt

lucreative

myatt

lucreative

omega1994

calalum

lucreative

myatt

Similar threads

[Seamaster Cosmic] Is this a redial?

Help is this a redial? Seamaster 14750 62SC

131.013 - Is this a redial?

Omega Seamaster 14K 'Waffle-Crosshair Dial' Cal. 354 - Needing guidance. Is it a redial?

Seamaster Chronograph CK2947 - is this a redial?

Is this a redial or wrong hands? Omega Seamaster