Is this a real omega?

Posts
1,433
Likes
1,571
I would say original dial, but would love to hear other opinions.
 
Posts
347
Likes
1,156
Dial looks good to me - didn't check whether the cal. 565 matches with a 166.001
 
Posts
11,038
Likes
19,416
Dial looks fine.

The rule around broken crosshairs indicating a redial kinda go out the window in the late 60's, particularly on 166.002's and similar.
 
Posts
3,772
Likes
20,184
How do you guys know it’s a redial
Well, sometimes the first indication is they look like someone used crayons to do it.

1043920-5cbf0ed65a90c47bb91a06421316c0ca.jpg
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
The glass has been replaced with plexiglass. Does this affect the value?
 
Posts
3,814
Likes
8,522
Crystal was plastic from the factory. No worries.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Crystal was plastic from the factory. No worries.
Vintage is so confusing, how come sometimes people want the original glass with the omega logo in the middle and then sometimes it doesn’t affect value?
 
Posts
3,814
Likes
8,522
I would say the crystal is the least of concern as they don't hold up well over time. An Omega crystal adds value. Most are still available as a replacement so don't sweat it.