Is the new Rolex Explorer 2 2021 any different aesthetically??

Posts
1,237
Likes
6,491
Looks practically identical!

Maybe thinner lugsm

How massively disappointing by Rolex this year!

 
Posts
8,742
Likes
69,457
So exciting to see the new case for this reference and the classic Datejust as well. 👍
 
Posts
733
Likes
1,457
Looks practically identical!

Maybe thinner lugsm

How massively disappointing by Rolex this year!


Thank you , I was thinking the same but was afraid to ask what's the difference.

 
Posts
34,515
Likes
39,081
Thank you , I was thinking the same but was afraid to ask what's the difference.

It has the new Calibre 3285 movement with 70 hour power reserve and ball bearing winding system. That’s the big change, but they’re rolling the movement out one watch per year instead of just applying the new movement to the entire model range like Omega did with the Calibre 8500/9300 and updated versions. So in a couple of more years they’ll have the new movement in all models.
 
Posts
170
Likes
256
It has the new Calibre 3285 movement with 70 hour power reserve and ball bearing winding system. That’s the big change, but they’re rolling the movement out one watch per year instead of just applying the new movement to the entire model range like Omega did with the Calibre 8500/9300 and updated versions. So in a couple of more years they’ll have the new movement in all models.

"Made of nickel-phosphorus, it is also insensitive to magnetic fields"

That's interesting when comparing this movement to Omega's newer movements. Although Rolex doesn't specify how anti-magnetic it is.
 
Posts
13,223
Likes
22,989
I’m going to call it now - there’s another Explorer 2, the anniversary edition, that will be released shortly, giving us three versions of the E2. What we’ve got so far isn’t the end of it.
 
Posts
34,515
Likes
39,081
I’m going to call it now - there’s another Explorer 2, the anniversary edition, that will be released shortly, giving us three versions of the E2. What we’ve got so far isn’t the end of it.
Same one with a green hand instead of orange? Seems about the level of effort they’d be willing to go to.
 
Posts
13,223
Likes
22,989
Same one with a green hand instead of orange? Seems about the level of effort they’d be willing to go to.

Ha probably. Maybe some green Explorer text and an Oysterflex.
 
Posts
102
Likes
210
Looks practically identical!

Maybe thinner lugsm

How massively disappointing by Rolex this year!

Don’t know about disappointing but I couldn’t tell at first new from old. Maybe that’s a good thing. About the new 36mm Explorer I at $6,400 US retail it’s not better or a better value than the AT 38mm. Besides the AT is better looking. The new dials in the Datejust are funky but not better looking than Omega’s AT. Then, I can’t stop but think that Rolex aimed to the stratosphere with the new Meteorite Daytona at over 34k retail which will prove impossible for most to afford or get. Can’t wait to get my hands on Omega’s new Seamaster 300m. Omega wins.
 
Posts
411
Likes
2,611
Think Rolex missed a trick by keeping the Explorer 2 at 42mm - would have liked to see it back at 40mm...
 
Posts
5,082
Likes
15,680
So in a couple of more years they’ll have the new movement in all models.

...by which time the movement will be old, and they will have a newer movement...and so the cycle continues...
 
Posts
537
Likes
808
The 3187 was built to fit the case, whereas now they're using the same movement as the rest of the GMT line - 2mm smaller.

To me the bezel looks about 1mm thicker, and I'd put money on it that the dial and case are about 1mm smaller. They've done a good job of preserving the overall look, but I'd love to see new and old side by side.

Looks practically identical!

Maybe thinner lugsm

How massively disappointing by Rolex this year!
 
Posts
3,998
Likes
9,019
One big (in relative terms) change:

Note that the new matte black EII no longer has “floating” hands:

Here’s the 216570 with floating hands (matte black paint at base of all but the seconds hand):


And here’s the new iteration with black dial, absent the floating hands:



Seeing them side-by-side, I realize now a preference for the floating hands aesthetic of the prior model.

Otherwise, in the new model there is a crown between “Swiss” and “made”, indicating the use of the “new” (to this model) movement.

Also side-by-side I find the new lug shape more attractive, and it appears perhaps they have adjusted the EII’s crown size upwards to better balance the watch?
 
Posts
111
Likes
421
So anyone who bought the old version in the last 12-18 months is probably breathing a sigh of relief at the minor updates or maybe feeling a little miffed as their version will be less desirable perhaps?
 
Posts
9
Likes
11
To me the bezel looks about 1mm thicker, and I'd put money on it that the dial and case are about 1mm smaller. They've done a good job of preserving the overall look, but I'd love to see new and old side by side.

This is the fix for the odd’ish look if they did it