Is my Seamaster Peter Blake to small?

Posts
39
Likes
11
It looks great on you and, to be honest, I wouldn't have said it was midsize.
Here's mine:

I think the P B version si fantastic
 
Posts
1,700
Likes
5,194
It looks a little small, thanks largely to the steel bezel which highlights rhe dial size. A black bezel variant with same size case would have appeared larger on wrist.

As for it it's too small? Not at all, I've always worn watches of all sizes, from 31mm to 44mm, have never worried about what size js right or wrong for current trends, I just enjoy mixing it up depending watch design.

Long way of saying it looks fine so just enjoy it😉
 
Posts
10,695
Likes
16,663
This debate pops up about once a year and the same tropes are trotted out every time.

Firstly 'Prince William has one so it must be fine'. Yes he does. He was gifted him when he was about 13 by his sainted mother. It looked good on him then, not so much now but understandably he wont be parted from it. He is also a Villa fan. Enough said.

Next, "I wear 33-35mm watches all the time and my grandfather stormed the Normandy beaches wearing one this size so if it was good enough for him" Yes true but his didn't have a massive bezel robbing about 10mm diameter of dial. A 36mm diver's watch has the same dial area as a 28-30mm regular watch which many (most) would consider a tad small these days for a bloke and about right for a lady. That's my main beef, not how it sits on the wrist which is just fine.

To reiterate though, the OP watch looks great and is not available in full size so I'd consider it even with my size prejudice. The dial here seems to be a darker shade than seen on either the electric blue 2255.80 or 2531.80 Bond. More like a slate blue-grey, more like the grey seen on some titanium LE models like the rare 2232.30 150th Anniversary LE. V nice indeed.

To each their own of course. There is no right or wrong in buying an Omega, well as long as it is genuine of course.
Edited:
 
Posts
5,117
Likes
52,145
Yes it looks small, I have the same problem with many 35mm watches and some that are larger too. Here in this photo my new to me Seamaster looks diminutive.


And it's not till I get a 40mm watch that the wrist to watch perspective improves but having said that a lot comes down to dial and bezel style, I have some watches that look quite large with their styling.
I never thought I had particularly large wrists in fact I thought the opposite however I can very successfully wear a 50mm watch and 47mm looks quite normal.

48mm


51mm
 
Posts
4,223
Likes
12,221
You'd totally freak out wearing some of my vintage pieces, 36mm is quite large compared to some of them.
 
Posts
39
Likes
11
It looks a little small, thanks largely to the steel bezel which highlights rhe dial size. A black bezel variant with same size case would have appeared larger on wrist.

As for it it's too small? Not at all, I've always worn watches of all sizes, from 31mm to 44mm, have never worried about what size js right or wrong for current trends, I just enjoy mixing it up depending watch design.

Long way of saying it looks fine so just enjoy it
Tnks
 
Posts
39
Likes
11
This debate pops up about once a year and the same tropes are trotted out every time.

Firstly 'Prince William has one so it must be fine'. Yes he does. He was gifted him when he was about 13 by his sainted mother. It looked good on him then, not so much now but understandably he wont be parted from it. He is also a Villa fan. Enough said.

Next, "I wear 33-35mm watches all the time and my grandfather stormed the Normandy beaches wearing one this size so if it was good enough for him" Yes true but his didn't have a massive bezel robbing about 10mm diameter of dial. A 36mm diver's watch has the same dial area as a 28-30mm regular watch which many (most) would consider a tad small these days for a bloke and about right for a lady. That's my main beef, not how it sits on the wrist which is just fine.

To reiterate though, the OP watch looks great and is not available in full size so I'd consider it even with my size prejudice. The dial here seems to be a darker shade than seen on either the electric blue 2255.80 or 2531.80 Bond. More like a slate blue-grey, more like the grey seen on some titanium LE models like the rare 2232.30 150th Anniversary LE. V nice indeed.

To each their own of course. There is no right or wrong in buying an Omega, well as long as it is genuine of course.
Tnks for your replay
 
Posts
4,223
Likes
12,221
Really cool
Thanks. And, for me this is fine because it is perfectly legible on the wrist. I will say that the US Army Air Corps quickly decided that they were too small to be read quickly enough for doing air navigation by a pilot and they were replaced by a 33mm version, which didn't last long because soon watches with a hacking mechanism were being produced and the need for the rotating seconds bezel was eliminated.
 
Posts
3,217
Likes
9,675
It looks good, about perfecly sized.

And as you say it makes your hands look bigger, you probably know the saying about big hands. Nudge-nudge, wink-wink.
Edited:
 
Posts
261
Likes
1,843
It looks good, about perfecly sized.

And as you say it makes your hands look bigger, you probably know the saying about nig hands. Nudge-nudge, wink-wink.
Say no more. You’re referring to the old saying “a man with large hands can never find gloves that fit properly”?
 
Posts
152
Likes
130
This debate pops up about once a year and the same tropes are trotted out every time.

Firstly 'Prince William has one so it must be fine'. Yes he does. He was gifted him when he was about 13 by his sainted mother. It looked good on him then, not so much now but understandably he wont be parted from it. He is also a Villa fan. Enough said.
I can only apologise for using this years allocation of the Prince William troupe with so much of the year remaining!