spacemission
·Only speaking for myself, I'd like to say a Rolex GMT or a Sub. But the reality is that I have three Casios and zero Rolex.
Watches are kind of like dogs. There are no bad dogs. The one you have is always the best.
Only speaking for myself, I'd like to say a Rolex GMT or a Sub. But the reality is that I have three Casios and zero Rolex.
Watches are kind of like dogs. There are no bad dogs. The one you have is always the best.
You owned an explorer II.
During my 2 deployments, I wore a G shock along most of my unit. No one wore a Rolex. As a combat unit, we were told that we couldn’t have shiny metal watches of any kind, dark non reflective colors only. (But that could have just my commander/unit rules)
Edit: thinking back on it now, on my 2nd deployment, our commander actually required every Marine in my unit to wear a watch (timepiece as he called it). It was one of his first orders when he took command before we went over.
If you think it weird that no one on here jumps to 'thank you for your service' which they often would on a US forum, it is not because we don't respect you, it is because in the English speaking world outside of the US that is not how respect is shown. And also of course because your service may have been in a cause that some on here don't necessarily share as it is a fully international forum.
Nevertheless, this English/Irishman says thank you for your service.
Rolex doesn’t make the favorite watch of terrorists.
+1
A few years after getting into watches, I started to come to this realisation. It's the key to happiness really.
I recently came across a YouTube video in which an enthusiast said something which resonated with me. He said that this hobby is accessible to all, and that a low cost watch like a Casio can still bring as much joy and satisfaction as a piece costing thousands. "The most important consideration when purchasing a watch is what the watch does for you". This humble G-Shock makes me smile almost as much as my more expensive pieces, just for what it can do for a fraction of the cost.
I was recently asking ChatGPT 4o about some older Longines models and it kept using omegaforums.net for references/citations. A good idea most of the time, but we have some pretty weird threads too 😁
This popped up in my Google search for a Casio.
When we summarize the text, we get this list of comparative features.
Casio watches are known for:
durability
Affordability
wide range of functions
significantly cheaper
practicality
Functionality
mostly quartz movements
wider variety of styles
sporty and utilitarian designs
reliable, everyday watch
Rolex is considered:
luxury watch brand
significantly higher quality materials
craftsmanship
prestige
much higher price
intricate mechanical movements
more refined aesthetic
status symbol
Without the brand names, the Casio list seems more weighty.
Just a curiosity to tickle your fancy.
I did and I still like it. I sold it to a forum member who called dibs and partial traded me back a Gallet Snow White.
I used the cash for a trip to Taipei and Tokyo with my wife. Flight was free with frequent flyer miles
I then bought a PO Summer Blue, which I sold to buy a 2264.50.
But I tripped over a local 2004 Mini Cooper S that was well maintained and essentially bought it for a little less than what I got for my Summer Blue.
My friend who I first sold the 16570 to called me a capricious watch slave. If brought to trial to defend myself I would guilty as charged.
Reminds me of a song, 'I may be crazy but it takes all my time.' That’s pretty much what retirement is like.
Currently my wife's career is in jeopardy due to the current administration so all bets are off.
Did you buy watches in Tokyo?
No, although it's known as a watch town. My wife and I did go to dinner with a forum member and his wife, which was a lot of fun.