Forums Latest Members
  1. w1n9m4n Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    121
    Likes
    23
    Anyone know anything about these?
    Not a bad looking piece for cheap... Screenshot_2015-07-09-07-04-13.png Screenshot_2015-07-09-07-04-46.png Screenshot_2015-07-09-07-04-34.png
     
    JimInOz likes this.
  2. Canuck Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,026
    ChrisN and JimInOz like this.
  3. w1n9m4n Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    121
    Likes
    23
    Here is another Screenshot_2015-07-09-07-14-16.png Screenshot_2015-07-09-07-14-24.png
     
  4. w1n9m4n Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    121
    Likes
    23
  5. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,723
    They may be decent, but I've never heard of them. Not collectible unless your last name is Crosby:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    gatorcpa
     
  6. w1n9m4n Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    121
    Likes
    23
    NOS for only $175...sounds good to me...looks nice
     
  7. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    12,206
    Likes
    15,723
    You can buy a new Seiko for $60. $70 if you want a bracelet. It is a far superior watch.

    Why would you want this?
    gatorcpa
     
    persco likes this.
  8. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    26,996
    Likes
    32,712
    Pretty meh imo, by the sounds of it, it was just one of the many cheaper generic movements of the era that ended up in economical no-name watches, and parts will likely be rare to find as well.

    As Gator suggests, a modern $60 Seiko would be better quality, it also wouldn't need a $200-$300 minimum service before wearing it unlike this thing - NOS means it needs to see a watchmaker before use.
     
    Giff2577 likes this.
  9. w1n9m4n Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    121
    Likes
    23
    Very true!
     
  10. dougiedude Carpe horologium! Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    7,162
    Likes
    74,255
    I can see why it would be attractive to own. At least for awhile....

    You would most likely be a fairly exclusive owner of one of these, at least in the US of A; it would be unlikely you'd see anyone else with one...

    I was intrigued by the 'Yema' brand a few months ago, and picked up a few for about the same price... but, of course, turns out, I only wore them for a day or two until their novelty wore out, and I bought another Swiss vintage with more heritage (then wore for a week, and....repeat...:D)....

    83eb8a7ef79c6c75ec513c03e82115dc.jpg 79be6dbf34dd9dc514fe4548c6f18fa3.jpg 58235bdb67f399c884d49d4a85f1297f - Copy.jpg 036e750c91cca5c728443c5eef403523.jpg
     
    Giff2577 likes this.
  11. noelekal Home For Wayward Watches Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    5,551
    Likes
    38,794
    It is interesting to see from the standpoint that I never heard of it.

    Does the enlarged view of the movement really indicate it to have 7 jewels?
     
  12. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    7,387
    Likes
    24,226
    Yema is a different kettle of fish. It has an interesting history, and produced some nice and attractive watches in the '60s. Worth collecting if you like the style, I'd say, although their most loyal following is the French collector community.
     
    Matty01 and lenny like this.
  13. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    It's hard for me to understand the mentality that a watch is attractive because fewer people also own it.

    I'm not saying that in some ways, all of us collectors fall for this trap, but it seems silly when you think about it. Like - why does it matter if nobody else is America is wearing the watch? Does that have any reference to its quality? That could mean it's anything from a one-off Philippe Dufour to a crappy Omega frankenwatch. We should let the watch rest on its laurels, which aren't too impressive.

    "Exclusivity", I guess, is part of the luxury game, though.
     
  14. dougiedude Carpe horologium! Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    7,162
    Likes
    74,255
    Well, for me, it's more about the fact it may be a small and under-appreciated brand that makes nice-looking, reliable, and afforable watches.

    Perhaps I was a bit naive, but until I ran across Yema, I didn't even know that there were French companies making their own designs, and using their own movements, so I thought I'd add one or two to the collection.

    I don't know much about the 'Crosby', but if their movement contains only 7 jewels, I think you'd be correct!

    As for Yema, I do agree with @Tony C. that they do have some laurels that they CAN rest on... in the early '50's, they made the first in-house French automatic chronometer, if I remember correctly :thumbsup:. My sub-seconds Sous Marine (above) has this one...

    Edit: I mis-spoke here; my Yema's are both hand-wind... I never acquired one of their historic chronometers :(...

    ...and, my apology goes to the OP for hijacking this thread!
     
    Edited Jul 9, 2015
    Matty01 likes this.
  15. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960

    It is true that (unknown brand) + (good quality/design) = :thumbsup:
     
    Matty01 likes this.
  16. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    16,355
    Likes
    44,937
    Whats with the antichoc on the dial !? ::confused2::
     
  17. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jul 10, 2015

    Posts
    15,492
    Likes
    32,385
    Duh!

    No chocolate for you when you wear me!

    Everyone knows that!

    :D

    Screen Shot 2015-07-10 at 9.15.04 pm.png
     
    RawArcher and Giff2577 like this.
  18. Matty01 Port Adelaide's No.1 Fan Jul 10, 2015

    Posts
    1,800
    Likes
    4,756
    Im equally fond of My Zenith, Omegas, Panerai and Ug
    and my irrelevanlty rare decent quality no namers...

    The rarity factor I dont care about at all, i just love having a bunch of secent quality swiss vintage beaters that I love the look of. Im also happy to get them serviced ...
     
    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
  19. redpcar Jul 10, 2015

    Posts
    3,699
    Likes
    7,911
    Crosby is a common watch in the US. I come across them plenty. I would consider them better than Timex and lower than Caravelle in quality. They don't bring any money. Findind a NOS one wouldn't get $20 out of my pocket. The initial build quality is not there.
     
  20. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Jul 10, 2015

    Posts
    16,355
    Likes
    44,937

    So the guy the other day shaking the banana strawberry milkshake should buy this....