Incoming Speedy 145.022

Posts
41
Likes
9
Hello Folks,

I came across this speedy 145.022 today and I will meet the seller (pro) later to see if I can grab it. Description as following "A close to NOS late 80’s Speedmaster Professional with undated card, non serif think font insert, 1479 bracelet and light Patina Long R Tritium dial"

Priced at USD $5,600 at the moment

Anything I should be careful about regarding this one?

Thank you!

LeBapt

mPksta.jpg

5GqSMb.jpg

tpvsu2.jpg

w098C7.jpg

G4RZ9R.jpg
 
Posts
482
Likes
754
I'm in the market for a same type of watch (no worries, not looking outside EU). When I look at the serial number, I get back that it's more likely from the early '90s (august '91 as one of the below sources says).

https://www.ilovemyspeedmaster.com/productiondateprediction/
https://serial-number-decoder.co.uk/omega/omega.htm
https://www.bobswatches.com/omega/serial-numbers

Question for other members that are much more experienced than I am - is that aligned with the long S/R dial?
 
Posts
1,134
Likes
1,689
Bezel has no serif at 70 so I don't think it's a B2 bezel, plus the overall tachy font looks too fat to me.
 
Posts
482
Likes
754
I'd also be curious what others have to say about the hands - they look a bit dirty, but you see it more often for comparable references.

And as said, the long S/R (which I think looks really cool) - I'm not sure if that is correct for early '90s, I think to have read somewhere that they are more '80s dials. But you can treat this as gossip as I'm by no means an expert, so hope someone knows more about it 😀.
 
Posts
1,202
Likes
5,254
Do the pictures show the same watch (I doubt it)? The second picture shows a bezel with serifs and a dial with a long closed S (as opposed to an long open S in the first picture)
 
Posts
482
Likes
754
Oh you are right! The second one has serif on the 70, first one doesn't!
 
Posts
16,306
Likes
44,890
Watch in blue background also has a small dent near 100 on the bezel, these are two different watches. Which one are you contemplating?
 
Posts
41
Likes
9
I haven't had notice it since they were on the same IG post, which should display the same watch. Let's say that it is the one with the card underneath. I will find out soon.
 
Posts
9,043
Likes
46,809
This looks like a reference 3590.50 from the late 80's. Dial, hands, bezel and bracelet all look correct for this reference. $5,600 is steep for this watch IMO. I would expect to pay more in the range of $4,600-$4,800, give or take.
Edited:
 
Posts
41
Likes
9
Ok so he had a bunch of speedmasters to sell and he got mixed up with the pictures on instagram... That's why it did not make sense.
The good watch is indeed the one with the card underneath with the non serif 70. Here are 2 pictures that I have managed to take in a car by night so pardon for the poor quality.
Once he gets back home he will shoot me some more pictures and with the case back open for me to check the serial because there is nothing on the lug. He told me that it was indeed a model from the 80's. The watch looks really nice.

5GvvSV.jpg

Z5QyfH.jpg
 
Posts
482
Likes
754
But if it's from the 80s, are all these websites for serial numbers that say that it's 91, incorrect?
 
Posts
41
Likes
9
The website is right. The serial number on the lug of one of the first pictures referred to the watch that got mixed up (blue background) with the one I am interested in. That one has been already sold and was, indeed, from 1991.
The one still up for sale is the one on the first picture.
 
Posts
9,043
Likes
46,809
If memory serves, the 3590.50 was produced from 1989 through 1996, so if the serial number of the watch in question places it within that date range, it would be correct for that reference.
 
Posts
41
Likes
9
If memory serves, the 3590.50 was produced from 1989 through 1996, so if the serial number of the watch in question places it within that date range, it would be correct for that reference.

I am waiting for the seller to send me a picture of the mov. number once he will be able to remove the case back from the 80's one so I can check the exact model.

Regarding the one from 1991, you are right. Here is the extract of the archives regarding a speedmaster that I already own since 1 year now and it is indeed a model 3590.50

CtAgXH.png
 
Posts
889
Likes
3,670
Looking at a couple of different references for serial numbers the watch with blue background looks to be a 3590.50 from late 80's to early 90's. I am not completely sure if that dial is correct for that reference. Quick search of 2 similar references (one my own) with serial numbers 48 3xx xxx so just a tad bit later than yours shows a short S dial. Spacefruits says long S is correct for 145.022-78 but doesn't necessarily mean its wrong just don't know when they transitioned the dial to short S.
 
Posts
41
Likes
9
Hello everyone,

I got the pictures of the movement, so here is it to sum up everything.

Serial number is 48259813 According to the above websites, the watch should date back from June 1990 ~1991 and here are the pictures of the back (should therefore be a model 145.022 as stamped on the caseback).

I confirm that there is no serial number on any lug, but only on the caseback.

I should give him my answer by today and I have managed to drop the price.

mPksta.jpg

bkLwGX.jpg

dW7Lmt.jpg


Z5QyfH.jpg

5GvvSV.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
1,325
Likes
1,867
Chrono second hand doesnt seem to line up to 12 o’clock, which would drive me mad

so you may need to factor in a service

personally, i would pass - the bracelet also doest fit very well, so think this watch has had a hard life
 
Posts
41
Likes
9
Thank you, I see what you mean about the bracelet. I did not notice it I have no idea if it means that the watch has been polished or that the bracelet worn out the case.
Edited: