Community Stories

IDGuy asks if older SMPs are better...

DSotW
Posts
215
Likes
306
As I am looking at a white version of the current SMP 300, I was searching on YT for videos about Seamaster.

As I was still awake at 4am this morning, I came across IDGuy's video where he asks if older SMPs are better than the current model. I admit he does make some compelling arguements in favour of the older ones.

Can anyone here weigh in?

 
Meme-Dweller
Posts
2,476
Likes
3,859
IDGuy is pretty cringe. He's a content spammer. In almost every video, he talks over stock photos/videos, basically telling you he has no experience with any of the watches and it's just his opinion based on the content he reads online, which you could do yourself. Imagine a critic telling you Movie A is better than Movie B when all he's seen are the trailers. That's IDGuy.

In my experience, the only thing better on the older Seamaster is the bracelet in terms of wearability. Subjectively, the size including thinness is better, but that varies based on your personal preference.
Edited:
 
padders
Posts
10,446
Likes
16,336
SMP in order of awsomeness:

2254/2255 Sword Hands and variants> 2531 Original Bond> 3rd Gen SMPc> Current 4th Gen SMP> Second Gen with 2500

That's my take. YMMV as ever.
Edited:
 
Donn Chambers
Posts
2,703
Likes
3,601
Better is always in the eye of the beholder. Things going for the older SMP300 Bond:

1. It is considerably thinner and the lug-to-lug is shorter as well.
2. Bracelet is thinner and less heavy.
3. Can generally be serviced by more local watchmakers who have an Omega parts account but are not certified for co-axial service. This can make service easier.
4. Cheaper to buy

Things against it:

1. Bracelet uses pins/collars and is a pain to adjust yourself, even with the proper tools. Very easy to lose a collar or bend a pin if you are into too much of a hurry or use cheap tools.
2. No micro-adjust on clasp.
 
dsio
Posts
34,271
Likes
38,891
padders padders
SMP in terms of awsomeness:

2254/2255 Sword Hands and variants> 2531 Original Bond> 3rd Gen SMPc> Current 4th Gen SMP> Second Gen with 2500

That's my take. YMMV as ever.

Value wise I think the two stars are the third gen 2500D ceramic as they’re just so durable yet cheap, and the titanium electric blue sword hands variant is probably my personal favourite because titanium is cool and so are electric blue dials.
 
gbesq
Posts
9,739
Likes
54,481
dsio dsio
Value wise I think the two stars are the third gen 2500D ceramic as they’re just so durable yet cheap, and the titanium electric blue sword hands variant is probably my personal favourite because titanium is cool and so are electric blue dials.
+1
 
dsio
Posts
34,271
Likes
38,891
Incidentally we filmed the third gen ceramic nearly 10 years ago, it’s just a short close up video of it but we’ll try to cover more in the future in longer form like the more recent videos.

It takes us some time but we do them all with the watch in person.

 
gbesq
Posts
9,739
Likes
54,481
dsio dsio
Incidentally we filmed the third gen ceramic nearly 10 years ago, it’s just a short close up video of it but we’ll try to cover more in the future in longer form like the more recent videos.

It takes us some time but we do them all with the watch in person.

Still the best version in my opinion. The non-tapering bracelet is a bit dated and too chunky for my taste, and you have to be careful with the AR coating on the outside of the crystal, but the watch itself is exceptional and the dial is a stunner.
 
Dan S
Posts
24,261
Likes
54,031
I don't understand the appeal of these youtube videos.
 
Scooterino36
Posts
897
Likes
2,821
gbesq gbesq
Still the best version in my opinion. The non-tapering bracelet is a bit dated and too chunky for my taste, and you have to be careful with the AR coating on the outside of the crystal, but the watch itself is exceptional and the dial is a stunner.
The newer Omega mesh bracelet pairs really well with the 3rd Gen SMPc
 
KeyWestPaw
Posts
537
Likes
964
I have a 2255 that I added the adjustable clasp to and its perfect (no mods needed)... I have had more modern versions but have moved them along, I've always thought the older sword hand SMPs were perfect. the addition of an adjustment in the bracelet sealed the deal as a keeper.
 
Jones in LA
Posts
5,562
Likes
54,029
Meme-Dweller Meme-Dweller
IDGuy is pretty cringe. He's a content spammer. In almost every video, he talks over stock photos/videos, basically telling you he has no experience with any of the watches and it's just his opinion based on the content he reads online, which you could do yourself. Imagine a critic telling you Movie A is better than Movie B when all he's seen are the trailers. That's IDGuy.

In my experience, the only thing better on the older Seamaster is the bracelet in terms of wearability. Subjectively, the size including thinness is better, but that varies based on your personal preference.

Well, it could be worse. Everything in IDGuy videos could be AI-generated. Or maybe it already is.
 
KeithS
Posts
1,468
Likes
19,522
DSotW DSotW
As I am looking at a white version of the current SMP 300, I was searching on YT for videos about Seamaster.

As I was still awake at 4am this morning, I came across IDGuy's video where he asks if older SMPs are better than the current model. I admit he does make some compelling arguements in favour of the older ones.

Can anyone here weigh in?


I made it halfway through the video. It was unpleasant. That guy can definitely drone on and on without saying much.

Anyways, after having owned multiple examples from every generation of the Seamaster Professional 300m, I still think the 2531.80 is the best version of the SMP.

And because no one has posted any pictures:

DSCF0072.jpeg IMG_8977.jpeg
Edited:
 
KeyWestPaw
Posts
537
Likes
964
this is the SMP they should have made.
Sword hands, wave dial in electric blue with blue bezel.
Mine has the longer adjustable PUSH clasp and blue bezel insert.

smpblue.jpg
 
foxtrot
Posts
233
Likes
687
I own the old and the new. In theory I prefer the old one, because of the smaller diameter and width...BUT when I have both in my hands I opt for the new one without any doubt...it is like emanates better quality...design..I can´t explain clearly...just try to ´touch´ them both.
IMG_0659W.jpg IMG_0974W3.jpg
 
Turpinrr
Posts
677
Likes
1,780
20240330_085944.jpg

My 2531.80 is a perfect fit.
When I tried a modern Seamaster on a couple of years ago I was underwhelmed.The news ones are stunning, especially the summer blue but they just don't suit me 🙁
 
hen
Posts
2,979
Likes
8,738
Dan S Dan S
I don't understand the appeal of these youtube videos.

Id guy has a video praising the 2254. This make me feel all warm and fussy inside. Great confirmation that I have bought the right watch.
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

Stoffel15

Omega Seamasters; Are these in good condition/which is better?

Stoffel15 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
padders
padders
Posts
3
Views
2K
larryganz

Birth-Year watches for your kids, and even better maybe Father-Child matching watches?

larryganz Open Discussion
Alpha
Alpha
Posts
10
Views
8K
airbag

Is an OLDER or NEWER Speedmaster a better Investment?

airbag Open Discussion
F
Flaudia402
Posts
17
Views
4K