I don't understand the recent Rolex SS craze/shortage. What am I missing?

Posts
5,116
Likes
17,782
...Nike’s premier limited edition sneakers are also impossible to get at retail, ....

The reasons these luxury brand companies ...

😲

Came for the Rolex, left with Nikes.

Nikes are luxury?!! Not arguing, just had no idea.

I need a drink....
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,988
Nikes are luxury?!! Not arguing, just had no idea.

Luxury in the sense of also trading in hype/exclusivity.

The shoes you see in a store are the ‘Tudor’ of Nike.

There are other shoes, you and I are unable to buy, that behave very much like Rolex/Hermès/AP, etc.

Here are a few screen shots from the sneaker equivalent of Chrono24 (note the % over retail figure)

 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,432
The shoes you see in a store are the ‘Tudor’ of Nike.

I don't understand the recent Nike sneaker craze/shortage. What am I missing?
 
Posts
21,073
Likes
48,119
Didn't realize this thread was still going on. Can I get a tl;dr for the last 10 pages?
 
Posts
5,116
Likes
17,782
Luxury in the sense of also trading in hype/exclusivity.

The shoes you see in a store are the ‘Tudor’ of Nike.

There are other shoes, you and I are unable to buy, that behave very much like Rolex/Hermès/AP, etc.

Here are a few screen shots from the sneaker equivalent of Chrono24 (note the % over retail figure)


No Tiffany's?
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,432
Didn't realize this thread was still going on. Can I get a tl;dr for the last 10 pages?

I’m game to try:

I have money. I should be able to buy what I want.
It doesn’t work that way any more.
Why?
Because reasons.
 
Posts
27,682
Likes
70,346
Recorded a documentary on the Beanie baby craze last night - haven't watched it yet but it will be interesting to see if there are any parallels. Not everything that is hyped, in high demand, and has premium pricing on the secondary market, is luxury. Personally, I would never put Nike shoes in the luxury product category.
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
Recorded a documentary on the Beanie baby craze last night - haven't watched it yet but it will be interesting to see if there are any parallels. Not everything that is hyped, in high demand, and has premium pricing on the secondary market, is luxury. Personally, I would never put Nike shoes in the luxury product category.
I guess it somewhat depends on one’s personal position in life. I doubt a Saudi Prince considers a Rolex luxury. But I take your point, Nike isn’t a luxury brand in the traditional sense. They are exceptional at branding and hype though, which I guess was why the comparison was made.
 
Posts
27,682
Likes
70,346
I guess it somewhat depends on one’s personal position in life. I doubt a Saudi Prince considers a Rolex luxury. But I take your point, Nike isn’t a luxury brand in the traditional sense. They are exceptional at branding and hype though, which I guess was why the comparison was made.

I think Rolex is a luxury product no matter what your personal financing is. It's just either and easy affordable one, or not. To me, luxury is more than hype and pricing - the product itself has to have some inherent characteristics to make it luxury, and Nike shoes don't have that.
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
I think Rolex is a luxury product no matter what your personal financing is. It's just either and easy affordable one, or not. To me, luxury is more than hype and pricing - the product itself has to have some inherent characteristics to make it luxury, and Nike shoes don't have that.
I agree with you completely that Nike isn’t a luxury brand but price has to come into the equation a little bit. When Rolex issued watches to the British special services, I’m not sure they were considered luxury items at the time, very robust and excellent time keepers but not luxury. From the small amount of reading, it seems Rolex repositioned itself as a luxury brand in the 70s, their advertising definitely seems to change around that time. All I’m saying is that branding or hype or whatever you want to call it does play a part in what is considered luxury.
 
Posts
27,682
Likes
70,346
All I’m saying is that branding or hype or whatever you want to call it does play a part in what is considered luxury.

Rolex turned itself into a luxury brand after decades of rebranding and product improvements. Nike's are just expensive shoes...nothing luxury about the brand or product.
 
Posts
5,116
Likes
17,782
Saying Rolex is not a luxury item seems similar to saying a 33 foot boat is not a yacht unless it's 79 feet. It might be a small boat to the super rich, but it's still a yacht.
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
Saying Rolex is not a luxury item seems similar to saying a 33 foot boat is not a yacht unless it's 79 feet. It might be a small boat to the super rich, but it's still a yacht.
Yes but it wouldn’t be considered a luxury yacht to the super rich. So you can consider a Rolex a watch but is it a luxury watch to a billionaire. It’s a rhetorical question unless we have any billionaires to chime in. Perception of luxury is definitely a subjective matter.
 
Posts
5,116
Likes
17,782
... Perception of luxury is definitely a subjective matter.

Mmmm, not so much to the overall watch community of forums, bloggers, podcasts. Rolex is defined as a luxury item.

I get the idea of subjectivity. My mother thought an orange was a luxury during the second world war. But to most of the world it was just an orange. There's always outliers.
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
So in Iceland oranges still appear to be luxury. And of course I’m not saying Rolex isn’t a luxury brand in my opinion and 99.9% of the world would agree. But one can not definitively say something is or isn’t luxury, it is very subjective.