I don't understand the recent Rolex SS craze/shortage. What am I missing?

Posts
3,998
Likes
9,015
But real world scenario @cvalue13 how long have you been on the list for a GMT?

Maybe 18 months?

But, don’t get the wrong impression: I asked to be on the list because why not, and I’m not waiting with abated breath or anything. If I get the call, great -> I’d like to have one, at MSRP, and I’m in no hurry.

It’s not like it required a full deposit and 12 month wait or anything ... 😗
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
So considering all of the above, what about a slight shift in thinking.

around 2015 Rolex looked at the Apple Watch and other smart watches and thought.....oh boy these are really going to hit our sports watch sales, we could be left with literally hundreds of thousands of these watches unsold / being discounted. Bad for margins, bad for brand. Let’s scale back production, if we create waiting lists we will know how many watches we actually need to make.

Now I’m not saying this was Rolex strategy but if it was it effectively introduced a pre order system through their waiting lists. They could also guarantee to sell what they made, and into the bargain created hype around hard to get models. It was a win win.

Maybe Rolex arent the hype machine I have previously created them for. Maybe they are a very cautious institution that limits production in fear of over production rather than trying to create hype.

I don’t know it’s all guess work, but it’s sits better with me as a business model.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,645
Likes
3,219
Rolex's strategy at the moment appears to be spot on. However, if a significant portion of current demand is driven by people buying Rolex's entirely (or even mostly) because they believe they will increase in value, then demand will drop precipitously as soon as Rolexes fail to increase in value for any sustained period of time (likely no more a year or two). If demand is in fact substantially built upon buyers relying on the "greater fool" theory of asset appreciation to justify their purchases, then this looks a lot like a financial bubble (see the dutch tulip bubble).

Good thing I prefer Omega 😀
That's what I'm hoping for. Fingers crossed.
I plan to swoop when that bubble bursts. It might not happen within a year. It might not happen for 10 years. But I'm in no hurry. Good things come to those who wait, as they say...
 
Posts
254
Likes
573
So considering all of the above, what about a slight shift in thinking.

around 2015 Rolex looked at the Apple Watch and other smart watches and thought.....oh boy these are really going to hit our sports watch sales, we could be left with literally hundreds of thousands of these watches unsold / being discounted. Bad for margins, bad for brand. Let’s scale back production, if we create waiting lists we will know how many watches we actually need to make.

Now I’m not saying this was Rolex strategy but if it was it effectively introduced a pre order system through their waiting lists. They could also guarantee to sell what they made, and into the bargain created hype around hard to get models. It was a win win.

Maybe Rolex arent the hype machine I have previously created them for. Maybe they are a very cautious institution that limits production in fear of over production rather than trying to create hype.

I don’t know it’s all guess work, but it’s sits better with me as a business model.

I really don't think Rolex have done much themselves to engineer the current situation, at least in terms of initiating it in the first place. It has fallen into their lap based on the massive explosion in interest driven by social media hype, with a new generation suddenly becoming interested in these watches en masse. This new generation are predisposed to chasing the steel sports models above all else, as that's what they're told to do.

What Rolex appear to have done is to resolutely stick with their existing product mix in the wake of this demand. This has been the real masterstroke, as it's clear that people will always look to the 'next best thing' as they simply must have a Rolex, any Rolex, and demand has trickled down the product stack accordingly. As the two tone and precious metal models have the biggest margin, it has done wonders for their sales.

I can see Rolex upping overall production in the years to come, but perhaps with the product mix skewed further to the precious metal pieces to take advantage of the situation further.
 
Posts
29,217
Likes
75,504
What Rolex appear to have done is to resolutely stick with their existing product mix in the wake of this demand.

Not so sure that they have stuck with their traditional product mix, but this is the million dollar question.

If you believe the AD's that people have spoken to who claim they are getting fewer sports models than in the past, it would put the claims that the mix hasn't changed into question certainly. Of course, only Rolex knows for sure, and you can bet they aren't telling anyone.
 
Posts
5,761
Likes
27,144
example of sales practice : I read today about a courtruling against a Salesman at an AD in the Netherlands whom got fired, in short:
Salesman knew a Submariner would be coming in the next day, swapped his workschedule to the early shift and made a call at work in the morning to somebody whom paid 6K, that same day the watch was on sale at a reseller for 10K.
 
Posts
1,645
Likes
3,219
example of sales practice : I read today about a courtruling against a Salesman at an AD in the Netherlands whom got fired, in short:
Salesman knew a Submariner would be coming in the next day, swapped his workschedule to the early shift and made a call at work in the morning to somebody whom paid 6K, that same day the watch was on sale at a reseller for 10K.
That is so dodgy. Have heard rumours that this sort of stuff is happening.
 
Posts
5,761
Likes
27,144
That is so dodgy. Have heard rumours that this sort of stuff is happening.
Probably the AD also fired the salesman because he was not following company policy to have a customer buy jewelry or a less sought after watch to be eligible for this Submariner in combination with lining his own pockets.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,706
The simple fact is that Rolex make watches that are desired around the world, from entry level SS models through to high end Platinum and customised variants these watches are the ones that people want to be wearing and are very very happy to pay the price to own one.

Rolex is a high priced piece of jewellery, sought after by many, aspired to by even more, people are desperate to own these watches and for some the cost isn't a consideration they just have to have a certain model no matter where it comes from, and that is fine.

Rolex could go and build another factory, make more watches and flood the market but what would that achieve, nothing. All it would do is wash away all the hard work that the brand has done to get it where it is now, possibly the most sought after watch brand in the world.

The way we buy our Rolex watches isn't going to change in the short or medium term, maybe in the longer term yes but for now it is what it is and nothing that we say or do is going to change Rolex's approach.

Why change a successful formula?
 
Posts
494
Likes
1,334
when Rolex starts treating me the way Omega does than I might consider buying another Rolex, This is what we should all do.
 
Posts
1,645
Likes
3,219
First, thanks for this thread and everyone involved. Today I stopped in to my local Rolex AD thinking I'd have a look at the new 36mm OPs. I left feeling mildly irritated and fairly certain my contact information pretty much went straight into the trash.

I'm just not sure I buy it. I'm also not sure I really even care. Oddly enough I don't think the woman working at this jewelry store was much into the whole predicament either. She did let it slip that they'd received the sum total of exactly 2 OPs in 41mm.

There's so much bad baggage from all angles pointed out by everyone else here already. There are so many other watches out there instead. Aside from Omega I'm really getting into JLC and Cartier.

Thinking on it now it feels really odd I even left my contact information. None of this is positive and I have a lingering bad feeling related to this brand. I know this is a sales tactic when all I really care about or want to care about is the watch. Next weekend I am planning on visiting a different AD that carries more lines.
Like I've said before. Just be patient and wait until this craze blows over. And never reward bad customer service.
In the meantime, there are lots of other fantastic watches out there that are more readily available if you really need to get a new one now. Personally, if I had to choose between a Rolex OP and Seamaster Aqua Terra with the co-ax escapement, I'd go the AT all day long.
 
Posts
102
Likes
210
when Rolex starts treating me the way Omega does than I might consider buying another Rolex, This is what we should all do.
Omega treats you wanting you to experience and buy Omega. It helps that I have an Omega boutique nearby. Whereas Rolex is doing you a favor.
 
Posts
586
Likes
749
I've only really got 'into' watches in the last 18 months and have dealings with one AD here in the UK.

In that time I've bought one watch with them to-date, the A11 but was apparently #1 to put a deposit down for a Snoopy, apart from this I've bought a rubber strap and deployment for a Breitling and sent another Omega off for a service.

After the Snoopy I am debating what I'll save up for next in a couple of years time, an Omega Globemaster, a 3861 Speedmaster Professional (to complete a superb trio), a Rolex Explorer or Rolex Submariner. I've been leaning towards a Rolex next as the last 2 watches and the next due are all Omega, possibly the Sub to scratch a diver's itch.

After a couple of conversations with the AD about my thoughts on my next piece, I have to formally register my interest for a Rolex, fortunately as an existing customer and being local this appears to be just a formality and at some point in the future I'd be asked to place a deposit as I progress up the list.

Here's the rub... even if I register now, they expect 2-3 years wait on an Explorer and around 5 years for a Submariner.

Now I understand a wait, I've patently waited 6 months since placing a deposit for my Snoopy on 6th October when they called to confirmed I could order one via them, this has now been delayed a further 6 months as Omega delayed their allocation. I was hoping to buy a Submariner in a couple of years time for my 50th however it looks like it simply wouldn't happen.

At this point do I drop my thoughts on buying a Rolex or do I join their list and hope supply improves... I refuse to go grey. The fact I could just order an Omega, Globemaster, Speedmaster or Seamaster, choice of colour, material etc. does make me wonder, why bother trying?
 
Posts
1,645
Likes
3,219
I've only really got 'into' watches in the last 18 months and have dealings with one AD here in the UK.

In that time I've bought one watch with them to-date, the A11 but was apparently #1 to put a deposit down for a Snoopy, apart from this I've bought a rubber strap and deployment for a Breitling and sent another Omega off for a service.

After the Snoopy I am debating what I'll save up for next in a couple of years time, an Omega Globemaster, a 3861 Speedmaster Professional (to complete a superb trio), a Rolex Explorer or Rolex Submariner. I've been leaning towards a Rolex next as the last 2 watches and the next due are all Omega, possibly the Sub to scratch a diver's itch.

After a couple of conversations with the AD about my thoughts on my next piece, I have to formally register my interest for a Rolex, fortunately as an existing customer and being local this appears to be just a formality and at some point in the future I'd be asked to place a deposit as I progress up the list.

Here's the rub... even if I register now, they expect 2-3 years wait on an Explorer and around 5 years for a Submariner.

Now I understand a wait, I've patently waited 6 months since placing a deposit for my Snoopy on 6th October when they called to confirmed I could order one via them, this has now been delayed a further 6 months as Omega delayed their allocation. I was hoping to buy a Submariner in a couple of years time for my 50th however it looks like it simply wouldn't happen.

At this point do I drop my thoughts on buying a Rolex or do I join their list and hope supply improves... I refuse to go grey. The fact I could just order an Omega, Globemaster, Speedmaster or Seamaster, choice of colour, material etc. does make me wonder, why bother trying?
I guess it depends on how badly you want that Sub. If you really want it, then be patient and wait. If you need a divers straight away, then a current Seamaster Pro is an excellent choice.
 
Posts
1,231
Likes
3,796
I had a conversation with the head sales rep at my local AD yesterday that I found extremely interesting and thought was very relevant to this thread. Some of this info might be repeated elsewhere, but I've seen a few comments about how there are no "hard facts" about this shortage, so here are some hard numbers straight from the horse's mouth.

This AD sold Rolex for decades, until this year they decided they'd had enough and stopped carrying them. I noticed that the Rolex "boutique" section of the store was gone and I asked him why. He said that, simply put, they were tired of having an empty case and no watches to sell. I asked him to elaborate on this a bit more and he actually said, "Well... ah, I guess I lied for them for years, I can tell you now."

He told me that up until a couple of years ago, the store was forced--forced--to purchase 30 Datejusts a quarter from Rolex in order to remain an Authorized Retailer. There were a number of other watches they had to buy as well; in total, they had to buy around 280 watches a year, outside of the desirable models. In addition to this, they had a steady supply of all steel sports watches--Subs, Sea Dwellers, GMTs, Yachtmasters, etc..

In 2020, they were allowed to purchase five (5) Datejusts, in total, for the entire year. They were able to get three Submariners. Five Oyster Perpetuals. One Milgauss. One GMT. In fact he said there were many watches that they simply could not obtain from Rolex. All told, when they ceased to be a Rolex AD, they had to refund $380,000 in deposits that people had made on watch orders that were never fulfilled.

Here's the really interesting part though. At the last sales meeting that he went to with Rolex, they were obsessed with what they call the "secondary multiplier". This is the ratio of a watch's value on the secondary market vs. its MSRP. The Rolex company rep said that prior to constricting the supply of the datejust, for example, the secondary multiplier was 0.9, meaning that it sold for LESS than retail on the secondary market. This was unacceptable to them, so they simply stopped shipping Datejusts and now they trade for well over retail. The same goes for various other references.

So this confirms that Rolex is artificially constricting supply in order to inflate the perceived value of their brand. Essentially they are trying to emulate Patek and AP, whose watches have enormous secondary multipliers are famously hard to obtain. The Rolex rep even pointed to those brands as successful examples of what they're doing. And honestly, if that's what they're trying to do, it seems to be working. Of course this comes at a cost to not only the consumer, but the salespeople, who are really hurting on commission now that they can't sell Datejusts all day long.

Anyway, thought that was eye-opening. Still slightly peeved that I sold my 114060 before all of this happened, but oh well.
 
Posts
870
Likes
1,573
While I don't pretend to have an inkling as to how Rolex itself works, I find a very great deal still depends on the AD and the rep you get.

My closest AD just lost their contract after many decades - I do not know details as to why; the sales manager told me Rolex pulled it but wouldn't say anything else. A year ago this same AD acted like they were doing me a favor to even show me a DJ they had available. I passed.

So anyway about a week ago, partially curious, partially because I'll be near it in a couple of weeks, I called the next closest AD, almost 200 miles away. Explained I primarily wear and collect steel models only, I know they're hard to get, wait lists, etc - much to my surprise not only did we have a good 15 minute chat about watches in general, but the salesman mentioned "I actually have a black dial 36 OP in right now - there's a gentleman who is coming to look at it this afternoon, but if he passes you're welcome to it."

When I mentioned I wouldn't be around their shop til May he mentioned they can't hold Rolex (expected) but also "but I'm also hoping we have a little more variety by then, so maybe that'll be better for you anyway if you want a blue dial" (I'd mentioned liking the looks of both the blue OP and the Milgauss)

Since then he has emailed me a note every time they get a new piece in, just in case there's something I want to make the drive for that day. He knows what I'm interested in, and nope, they haven't all been PM models and DJs - today he emailed about a Submariner!

Now that is the customer service it seems like all ADs used to have!
 
Posts
1,231
Likes
3,796
The 2021 watches don't even really exist. It's all just about putting the deposit money in bitcoin. Damn you Hans Wilsdorf!

Honestly at this point, if Rolex dealers were revealed to be running a scam whereby they "borrow" their customers' money to invest in Bitcoin, I wouldn't even be surprised.

Also, it's crazy how much money people are okay with just giving away for months or in some cases, years. One guy apparently had a full deposit down for a gold daytona for almost 2 years. $30k, just sitting with a watch retailer instead of doing anything useful. Nuts.
 
Posts
33,477
Likes
38,177
Honestly at this point, if Rolex dealers were revealed to be running a scam whereby they "borrow" their customers' money to invest in Bitcoin, I wouldn't even be surprised.

Also, it's crazy how much money people are okay with just giving away for months or in some cases, years. One guy apparently had a full deposit down for a gold daytona for almost 2 years. $30k, just sitting with a watch retailer instead of doing anything useful. Nuts.
That’s pretty nuts on a Gold Daytona I had no idea the lunacy had reached those unless its the “Mayer” one that has been hyped to the moon.
 
Posts
1,231
Likes
3,796
That’s pretty nuts on a Gold Daytona I had no idea the lunacy had reached those unless its the “Mayer” one that has been hyped to the moon.

It was probably one of the hype pieces but not sure if it was that one. I think the issue was that they just weren't getting any Daytonas. They couldn't get a single one in in the time they had the guy's deposit (at least, the one he wanted).
 
Posts
3,998
Likes
9,015
So this confirms that Rolex is artificially constricting supply

This bit is the confusing part, as it doesn’t square with the industry data showing that Rolex produced and sold 800k watches last year while Omega sold only 500k.

In theory, it could mean that Rolex is redirecting watches towards some geographical areas and not others, and/or toward some ADs and not others.

But, 👎, while your story shows Rolex is definitely constricting flow to some ADs (to say nothing of the stories of Rolex yanking ADs altogether), I can’t square it with the data suggesting that Rolex is selling 1.6 watches for every 1 watch sold by Omega, and that Rolex is 25% of market by retail value compared to Omega’s 8.8%.

Here's the really interesting part though. At the last sales meeting that he went to with Rolex, they were obsessed with what they call the "secondary multiplier".

The last few years, industry analysts of the Swiss watch industry are ALSO fixated - as investors - in the secondary multiplier. In short, brands with <1 both (A) lose sales of new units, and (B) have to discount off MSRP for new unit sales, and these (according to the analyst groups) come together to disproportionately hit a brand’s bottom line.

No surprise then that Rolex is managing toward that topic, too.