Forums Latest Members
  1. Renato75 Nov 12, 2017

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    0
    I have bought this watch on ebay. What do you think? I hope it’s a good take. It’s my first Omega
     
    F966A6BB-415D-48AB-B202-B9D677602B2F.jpeg 50AEBCD4-AB47-4C72-8226-C6CEEE6232DE.jpeg
  2. UncleBuck understands the decision making hierarchy Nov 12, 2017

    Posts
    3,420
    Likes
    7,746
    Renato, please re-read (or read) the title of this thread!
    We keep this thread only to recommend watches, not for general discussions


    Thank you and welcome!
     
  3. Renato75 Nov 12, 2017

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    0
    Ok. Sorry
     
  4. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Nov 12, 2017

    Posts
    5,161
    Likes
    7,891
    Do you have a straight on pic of the dial?
     
  5. Renato75 Nov 12, 2017

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    0
    No, only image from ebay now. Not high definition
     
    69C6D288-0C54-4A1A-888C-F24A771C14A7.jpeg
  6. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Nov 13, 2017

    Posts
    17,106
    Likes
    25,350
    Movement number stamp looks interesting... do you have a picture of the inner caseback?

    Dial pictures aren’t giving enough info to tell you if it’s been redone or not.
     
  7. kreyke Nov 13, 2017

    Posts
    626
    Likes
    838
    Looks like a heavily polished 168.004 with a wrong crown.

    Black dials are frequently redials but from the bad photos, I can’t see any red flags yet. So there is still a chance that it’s original.

    For my benefit, what are you referring to or what stands out to you?
     
  8. ConElPueblo Nov 13, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    Well, the advert states that the dial has been "superbly refinished" and combined with a less than very attractive case I'd say that most of the collector interest has gone.
     
    krillan50 likes this.
  9. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Nov 13, 2017

    Posts
    17,106
    Likes
    25,350
    The lack of clear movement stamp it looks like 55 smear not a 3 digit number. It could be the photo.
     
    kreyke likes this.