fiberguy
·I recently bought the blue version on a bracelet. I like the bracelet, but I ordered the blue Omega rubber strap that I plan to rotate on an off.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
The lume is not as cleanly applied as a genuine. It’s easiest to see on the 6 o clock marker. The hour markers are yellower than they should be. The engraving of the ZrO2 is too deep. The date wheel color doesn’t match the dial color. The crown guards are too short, making the crown look like it sticks out too far.
I’m sorry, but what the h*** have you been smoking. I don’t see any of these “tells” you are talking about. Look genuine to me.
The 1s are clearly not gen. The Gen 1 has a sharper point under its tail. The 1s on the replica don't even match each other.
And this was from an image of the watch the user posted before.
There are even more tells like the size of the He valve, the size of the scallops, the "Swiss made" text, the sparkling on the hands (from bad finishing), minute markers being too bold, too sloppy, and too raised.
It's not cool to be derisive just because you're ignorant. The fact that it looks genuine to you means nothing. If you can't see any of these tells, there must be an issue with your perception. This Seamaster is 100% a Chinese replica. The tells are not random either. They are completely understood and studied by people who know.
The 1s are clearly not gen. The Gen 1 has a sharper point under its tail. The 1s on the replica don't even match each other.
And this was from an image of the watch the user posted before.
There are even more tells like the size of the He valve, the size of the scallops, the "Swiss made" text, the sparkling on the hands (from bad finishing), minute markers being too bold, too sloppy, and too raised.
It's not cool to be derisive just because you're ignorant. The fact that it looks genuine to you means nothing. If you can't see any of these tells, there must be an issue with your perception. This Seamaster is 100% a Chinese replica. The tells are not random either. They are completely understood and studied by people who know.
Sorry for the rudeness of my comment, but the pictures you are supplying as proof that the watch posted in the original pictures were fake are not even of that watch. The dates are not the same! The pictures you show are more yellow than what I see in those pictures. The angles are different. If you are calling out the pictures the OP posted as examples of fakes, please use those to show your evidence.
Whether or not the watch is real or fake you are not the big hero of the Forum for coming on here like a ton of bricks, pompously playing "gotch ya" and acting like the big Forum watch sheriff. There are tells that indicate you are an ill bred jerk. Those tells are not random either.