Forums Latest Members
  1. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    DCEAE038-2E11-4C9F-9639-E1E15C5753B7.png 34202673-790C-43E5-B5F6-B434AA04CE74.png 9B3CE437-5621-4471-B701-E163A113B8B8.png AF3AA6E3-3F4A-4476-9239-C23C78DDD943.png 3ADD7E5E-D245-48F9-B0EA-99B9D6E56D9F.png 29B221BB-CA61-4E57-AEFD-8C020EE260E1.png I’m just after people’s thoughts on this Beauty?
    How Original does it look? Apparently Caliber 1040 but no pics.
     
    PaulC77 likes this.
  2. JimJupiter Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    All fake, cause it’s apparently not a „Jedi“.
    For a 007 though, it looks good!

    Nico
     
    Northernman and Castle4444 like this.
  3. Lucasssssss Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    622
    Likes
    966
    Firstly, have a look at this website if you haven't; http://www.calibre1040.com/ Andy K on these forums is an expert on these models.

    I have a gold 176.007, without the original bracelet. The sunburst finishing on yours looks okay, this is the first to go usually when polishing a watch. The bracelet is present which is good. You will have to look at the various dial configurations on the Calibre1040 website etc.
     
    Castle4444 likes this.
  4. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    It’s being advertised as 176.001 Jedi. So they didn’t do 176007 Jedi?
     
  5. doog Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    94
    Likes
    59
    As Jim so correctly pointed out, it’s a perfectly nice 176.007, but a Jedi it most certainly is not. A Jedi (according to Chuck Maddox naming conventions) is a 145.0024 with a Cal. 861 just like a Speedy, and obviously a 176 has a different calibre (1040) and therefore a different sub-dial layout. Hope that helps...
     
    Castle4444 likes this.
  6. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    So like this? 55045B3F-4492-4323-BE42-017D18D3D302.png
     
    PaulC77 likes this.
  7. JimJupiter Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    Jap that’s a real Jedi. Often you also read about the 176.005 called Jedi, but the „real“ one is the 145.024

    That’s my unreal Jedi ;)
    D81E54DB-EA68-421D-A699-E3D03826CFC3.jpeg
     
    PaulC77 and Castle4444 like this.
  8. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    That’s drop dead gorgeous!!!!
     
  9. Kja Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    538
    Likes
    511
    Learning quick you are young Jedi...

    (Sorry being lame)
     
    Castle4444, frederico and doog like this.
  10. doog Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    94
    Likes
    59
    Spot on. According to Fratello, the previous incarnation 0023 with the case finished in Black was nicknamed “Darth Vader” by the inestimable Mr Maddox, with the natural metal version being named after “Anakin Skywalker” as he hadn’t gone over to the Dark Side yet.
     
    Castle4444 likes this.
  11. lillatroll Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    2,695
    Likes
    4,197
    looks ok. I don't have a SS version but you can compare it with my gp version. I don't have it on a bracelet but original leather strap.
    214907-e61d9644aebf06fd17ee5bfb5ca9ae0c.jpg 214903-bf43060c06202fca3a0bc94d313a6749.jpg
     
    MCC, Castle4444, frederico and 2 others like this.
  12. timestamp Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    359
    Likes
    1,729
    IMHO there are a few issues besides the incorrect "Jedi" name:

    1) The dial belongs to a 176.010 (the Yachting Chrono), not 176.007 or 176.001.
    2) The Tachymeter ring should be blue for a silver-dial 176.007, or not present at all if it's a 176.001

    The hands look fine. As others have said, the case is in nice condition, and the bracelet, or more precisely, the 653 endlinks are quite rare and look good.
     
    Edited Nov 5, 2017
  13. Lucasssssss Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    622
    Likes
    966
    Concerning 2) I was under the impression that the white on silver is only thought to be incorrect (as no one has proved one way or the other). Somewhat of a moot point in this case, as I imagine this watch came originally with a blue dial.
     
  14. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    Bit of a Frankenstein by the sounds of things
     
  15. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    Think I may pass on this one, I love the combination though
    very nice!!!!
     
    lillatroll likes this.
  16. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    Hahaha!!! I really do love this forum. Every time it’s a good lesson learnt.
     
  17. JimJupiter Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,499
    That wasn't uncommon back than, I think Maddox also wrote something about that.
    My 007 also has a Yachting dial, but was never serviced (before I did) and from the first owner.

    DSC_8483.JPG
    Nico
     
    timestamp and Castle4444 like this.
  18. Castle4444 Nov 5, 2017

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    Decided to leave it in the end, sold for £1850.