Stories Community
Forums Latest Members
Forums > Other Watch Brands > Seiko Watches >

How do you read this accuracy spec?

  1. vitriol

    vitriol Aug 5, 2020

    Posts
    982
    Likes
    2,914
    I met a friend and as proper geeks we had a chat about the accuracy, what is -in and what is -outside the official specs.
    We had a disagreement, which was odd as both were referring to the Seiko technical guide.
    We downloaded that guide and things became a little more clear, he was reffering to page no.1 while I was referring to the page no.18...

    sk-1.jpg sk-2.jpg

    Soo.... what is going on here?
    How do you read this Schrödinger guide. Which isochronism faults and positional variations errors are valid for you?

    Full doc is here.
    https://www.seikoserviceusa.com/uploads/datasheets/6R15CD.pdf
     
  2. Canuck Ω 1

    Canuck Aug 5, 2020

    Posts
    13,478
    Likes
    38,024
    It might help us comment if we knew what degree of accuracy the two of you expect. Seiko isochronism. Now there is a classic oxymoron.
     
    Waltesefalcon likes this.
  3. Dan S Ω 2

    Dan S Aug 5, 2020

    Posts
    18,816
    Likes
    43,265
    That is funny that they have different standards on different pages.
     
  4. Archer Ω 2

    Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Aug 6, 2020

    Posts
    26,464
    Likes
    65,607
    Seiko's documentation tends to follow conventions that are "out of the norm" let's say...

    I see the set of numbers on the first page as the full wind variations permitted. So average daily rate (measured over the three positions listed) can be anywhere from -15 to +25 seconds per day. A very large tolerance.

    But the odd part is that they give allowable numbers for each position that are anywhere from -/+10 to -/+15, so not quite sure how you would get +25 for the average if all the positions were within their tolerances.

    I believe the second page has a typo, and where it says in the first paragraph to make sure the value shows within the range of the table "below" it should read "above.'

    Then the table below is for comparing the 24 hour readings in the same 3 positions to the 0 hour readings (full wind) to see if they vary more than those values. This of course means that they can be really far out now. Anyway, my best guess...

    Oh, and you know when people say Seiko makes absolutely everything in house of their own design? Check the "regulation system" ETACHRON, of course made by ETA...
     
    sonicosa likes this.
  5. vitriol

    vitriol Aug 6, 2020

    Posts
    982
    Likes
    2,914
    Lol, this is not IKEA, this is a serious business where we trust that paper documentation means something actually.;)


    I do agree there is a broken logic in -15 to +25 spd and the max. allowed values given in variations in 3 positions.
    If there is a typo in "above/below", it is inherrited since the beginning, since A generation of this movement.
    https://www.seikoserviceusa.com/uploads/datasheets/6R15AB.pdf

    Another funny and frustrating fact is here
    https://www.seikoserviceusa.com/uploads/datasheets/6R15B_C.pdf
    In OP I have placed the specs for C/D generation, which is:
    T0 : -/+10 ; -/+15, -/+15 and isochronism is -/+10.
    In the B/C manual, the specs are:
    T0 : -/+10 ; -/+15, -/+10 and isochronism is "10" (no clue is it -/+, it is just "ten" :)
    Then, A/B manual says:
    T0 : -/+10 ; -/+15, -/+15 and isochronism is -/+10.

    As each of those paper are covering two generations - it means that each generation has at least two official specs. Both specs are different and are correct at the same time.
    I really feel sorry for anyone who works in Seiko service centre.