Forums Latest Members

Hot Take: Speedmaster Moonwatch 321 Platinum

  1. Robert-Jan #SpeedyTuesday Jul 20, 2019

    Posts
    1,498
    Likes
    5,337
    [​IMG]
    Exactly 50 years ago, Apollo 11 landed on the Moon and on the wrist of Edwin ‘Buzz’ Aldrin was an Omega Speedmaster Professional 105.012. From that moment, the chronograph as part of the astronaut’s official equipment became ‘The Moonwatch’. Today, Omega shows us the Speedmaster Moonwatch 321 Platinum to commemorate Apollo XI and celebrate caliber […]

    Visit Hot Take: Speedmaster Moonwatch 321 Platinum to read the full article.
     
  2. Evitzee Jul 20, 2019

    Posts
    6,330
    Likes
    11,724
    They are speculating 50,000+ Euros, about $56,000. Call it $60k. Considering markups for precious metal cases I would guess we are looking at $20,000 for the eventual steel version. Omega is going up market.
     
    BenBagbag likes this.
  3. T3F Jul 20, 2019

    Posts
    44
    Likes
    53
    Hmm.

    I like it, but it's also kind of underwhelming. Not having a bracelet is a big miss, in my opinion, and that pricing puts it in the range of the VC Cornes de Vache, PP 5170, etc., which is really tough company to keep. I'm quite disappointed they elected not to finish the 321 very well -- I'd get it if they were putting it in a steel watch, but for something this expensive, they really should've done more. I honestly would have preferred just a reedition of the 145.012 but in platinum. This is nice but just seems kind of weird to me for some reason.

    The jury is out on whether I'll buy one, but I can't help but think that despite this being nice and having some elements that are really appealing, this is a bit of a weak effort and is the worst of the three Apollo 11 commemorative editions to me.
     
    cholack and Larry S like this.
  4. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Jul 20, 2019

    Posts
    16,355
    Likes
    44,936
    Look who called it yet again. :D



     
    Kmart, rob#1, MTROIS and 11 others like this.
  5. whyboddau Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    346
    Likes
    1,039
    Gorgeous piece. Display back was expected. Platinum was speculated too. Meteorite was a little surprise.
     
  6. henrikaa Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    256
    Likes
    210
    Meteorite is fantastic! But do we really have a confirmed price?
     
  7. JohnSteed Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Short indices? Nope!
     
  8. 105012 Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    386
    Nice to see the acknowledgement of the ST105.012 as the first watch on the moon (-65 to be precise). This same caliber was also worn by Cernan on his EVA's, so the last watch worn on the moon. Celebrating this historic moment 50 years ago (ST105.012-65):
    DSCF2376.jpg
     
  9. Meme-Dweller Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,921
    Likes
    3,015
    Why does the meteorite look different from the meteorite Omega has used in the past? Maybe it's just the stock photos, but it looks like a material that could be mistaken for marble
     
  10. Caliber561 Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,474
    Likes
    2,512
    Previous meteorite used was from a Namibian meteorite, if memory serves. This is meteorite that originates from the moon.
     
    apsm100 and red crowned like this.
  11. Ian_km Jul 21, 2019

    Posts
    280
    Likes
    257
    I like it, think it’s my favourite of the three 50th editions, unfortunately the price is out of my reach.

    Subdials and onyx dial look great.
     
  12. fskywalker Jul 22, 2019

    Posts
    3,047
    Likes
    5,952
    Well Robert, assume Omega does not make it a limited edition to keep open the possibility of building more of them if there is the market for that, but for that amount of $$$$$ it should at least be a numbered edition ::facepalm1::
     
  13. M'Bob Jul 22, 2019

    Posts
    6,407
    Likes
    18,207
    Makes my wallet rattle, but not enough to open up...
     
  14. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Jul 22, 2019

    Posts
    12,539
    Likes
    49,805
    I’m sure they will sell. I’ll enjoy my crusty 2998-6. Too much bling for a tool watch. The level of finish on the movement at the projected price level is underwhelming. Pulse is not racing.
     
    Traveler likes this.
  15. Vix Jul 22, 2019

    Posts
    43
    Likes
    61
    I would if I could. I like it a lot.
     
  16. M'Bob Jul 22, 2019

    Posts
    6,407
    Likes
    18,207
    Yes.

    Yes again


    Yes a third time.

    Yes, for certain.

    The question is, for a big company that most assuredly does extensive market and demographic research, who is their intended audience for this piece? If not collectors, who obviously care about the above-noted details, then just deep-pocked dudes who probably couldn't give a hoot what caliber movement was running the thing?

    Further...if I was really hot to get a smashing cal. 321, why not pony up a third of the price for a killer Ed White or 105.002, like @dsio's?
     
    Pun, Kmart, Mad Dog and 4 others like this.
  17. dinexus Jul 22, 2019

    Posts
    663
    Likes
    1,183
    Short indices? That's what got you? If the indices were a little longer, would the $60k asking price suddenly seem palatable?
     
    Larry S likes this.
  18. cholack Jul 23, 2019

    Posts
    207
    Likes
    309
    Too bad this is unobtainium
     
  19. JohnSteed Jul 23, 2019

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Short indices may work for others....not a preference for me, likely at any price haha
     
  20. dscoogs Jul 23, 2019

    Posts
    647
    Likes
    4,184
    From the Smithsonian images, it appears that Cernan's Apollo 17 watch (last watch on the moon) is a 105.012-66 CB:
    https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/chronograph-cernan-apollo-17

    and that Cernan's Apollo 10 watch is a 105.012-65:
    https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/chronograph-cernan-apollo-10
     
    nonuffinkbloke likes this.